AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
1,022 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalNov 2025Dismissed
A university sponsored a clinical assistant professor of dentistry for an EB-2 national interest waiver to develop integrated clinical education and research. The AAO found the advanced degree requirement met but dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, with benefits limited to institutional and student levels, not broader field or economic impacts.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringNov 2025Dismissed
A postdoctoral scholar in civil and environmental engineering proposed research on traffic safety and autonomous vehicles under NIW. The AAO found working in a nationally important field insufficient and concluded the petitioner did not demonstrate the proposed endeavor itself has national importance or broader field impact. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsNov 2025Dismissed
Fencing club petitions for fencing master's O-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found only one of eight criteria met. Awards criterion failed because evidence showed students' achievements, not beneficiary's own. Judging criterion failed due to uncorroborated self-serving assertions. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWElectrical and electronic engineeringNov 2025Dismissed
Senior hardware engineer at semiconductor company seeks EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Petitioner conceded substantial merit but AAO rejected national importance, finding evidence conflated field importance with specific endeavor impact. No demonstration of innovations extending beyond employer or broader industry impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
Marine engineer and FSRU vessel manager sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. Despite EB-2 qualification, petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor in shipbuilding and energy security. References to federal programs insufficient without demonstrating direct involvement. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIOct 2025Dismissed
A computer science researcher with a master's degree in computer science sought EB-2 NIW classification. Although qualified as an advanced degree professional, the AAO found his proposed endeavor in artificial intelligence and large language models lacked demonstrated national importance beyond his employer.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIOct 2025Dismissed
Engineering graduate student self-petitioner sought NIW for AI research using linguistics and game theory. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details and documented prospective impact required to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
Software development manager seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed endeavor has national importance for digital key management solutions in storage and government sectors. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to employer and clients, not the broader storage industry or field.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
A mechanical engineer with an advanced degree sought an NIW for a proposed endeavor in ultrasonic guided-wave damage detection for infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor despite its STEM and emerging-technology focus.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaOct 2025Dismissed
An urban and regional planning researcher sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, as it did not demonstrate novel innovation or broader field-wide impact comparable to Dhanasar examples. The first NIW prong failed, and remaining prongs were not reached; the appeal was dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIOct 2025Dismissed
AI/ML software engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for on-device machine learning development. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance. Letters claiming critical role insufficient without corroborating evidence of broader field implications or economic effects. Second and third Dhanasar prongs not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMathematics and statisticsOct 2025Dismissed
Applied mathematician with doctorate proposed algorithm optimization for medical devices. Possessed substantial merit but failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor. Evidence about medical devices industry and general STEM field importance insufficient without showing direct national impact. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIOct 2025Dismissed
Information technology researcher with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has national importance but petitioner lacks relevant expertise, clear research plan, and demonstrated funding success needed to be well-positioned to advance it.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalOct 2025Dismissed
Mental health hospital petitions for EB-2 NIW on behalf of rehabilitation therapist providing art therapy to forensically committed patients. Beneficiary qualifies as advanced degree professional but proposed endeavor lacks national importance; job duties would not impact therapeutic field broadly at national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
An aerospace engineer with a Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with NIW for fatigue/damage tolerance research demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong but failed the second, lacking evidence his work influenced the field or represented record of success in advancing the endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2025Dismissed
Senior reliability engineer with Ph.D. in mechanical engineering sought NIW for continued work in consumer electronics hardware reliability testing. AAO found work lacked national importance; specific endeavor did not have broader implications beyond assigned hardware modules despite field importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2025Dismissed
General manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business consulting services claimed company importance to U.S. business ecosystem. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact business consulting field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects at national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2025Dismissed
A software development manager with master's degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO held his proposed work as a software development manager lacked national importance; despite alignment with cybersecurity policy goals, no evidence demonstrated prospective impact beyond employer clients or field-wide significance. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateSep 2025Dismissed
A field engineer and X-ray fluorescence analyst sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held that while the proposed research endeavor on petroleum engineering and methane emissions demonstrates substantial merit, it lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, and did not address the remaining prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2025Dismissed
Researcher in cybersecurity sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found his proposed AI-based research had national importance but dismissed because he lacked sufficient record of success and feasible plan demonstrating he could advance it as described in academic or industrial environment.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A marketing director for a luxury resort wear company sought extraordinary ability classification through employer petition. Claimant submitted five criteria but failed three regarding awards, publications, and critical role. AAO declined final merits review after finding insufficient initial evidence threshold satisfaction.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaSep 2025Dismissed
Education and public safety specialist seeks EB-2 NIW for proposed security services business and training company. Petitioner qualifies as advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of endeavor or evidence of success positioning her to advance it, thus ineligible for waiver.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringSep 2025Dismissed
Employer-sponsored NIW petition for driver information applications engineer beneficiary. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's proposed work has sufficient national importance; benefits limited to employer without broader field-wide implications.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2025Dismissed
A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.
1 of 3 criteria metRead →
