AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
1,099 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- O-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2025Dismissed
A tattoo arts studio petitioned for O-1A classification for a tattoo artist. The petitioner claimed extraordinary ability through a 2022 award and lead performances at multiple events. The AAO found the award lacked standing and that participation in events did not demonstrate starring or lead roles, dismissing the appeal.
0 of 2 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureMay 2025Dismissed
A bakery and pastry chef sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed bakery operation lacked national importance required under Dhanasar. The endeavor would benefit only direct customers without broader implications or significant employment impact on a national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherMay 2025Dismissed
Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 NIW claimed training programs and maintenance improvements would address aviation mechanic shortage with national importance. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and would not impact field broadly beyond individual trainees or employers.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2025Dismissed
A staff product manager with advanced degree sought NIW for privacy-centric advertising work. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that her specific endeavor had national importance beyond her employer's operations, lacking evidence of industry adoption, technology transfer, or broader societal or economic impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2025Dismissed
A computer scientist developing driver monitoring technology sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor, though meritorious, lacks national importance because the record does not establish broader prospective impact beyond the employer or adoption by other manufacturers.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringMay 2025Remanded
Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2025Dismissed
Technology entrepreneur with advanced degree seeks NIW for AI-driven cognitive decision support tools for aerospace and aviation. AAO withdrew director's finding on national importance prong, agreeing technology aligns with government priorities. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate record of success as executive or sufficient qualification to lead endeavor as CEO/CTO.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2025Dismissed
Dismissed · 4 criteria reviewed0 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2025Remanded
Tattoo studio petitioned for O-1A classification for tattoo artist beneficiary. AAO determined beneficiary met at least three evidentiary criteria despite SCOPS finding only two. Decision withdrawn and remanded for SCOPS to evaluate totality of evidence and determine whether beneficiary demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim in the arts.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaMay 2025Dismissed
An assistant professor in classics sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor—study of ancient inscriptions, preservation of epigraphical resources, and classics teaching—has substantial merit but lacks the requisite national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, and did not address the remaining prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1AEntrepreneurshipMay 2025Dismissed
Technology company petitioning for cofounder and CEO claiming extraordinary ability in technology entrepreneurship. Required three of eight criteria; met only one. AAO held venture funding, Forbes membership, and website articles insufficient under O-1A requirements.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringMay 2025Dismissed
Civil engineer and researcher with Master's degree seeks NIW for waterborne disease framework research. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met first two Dhanasar prongs but failed the third: while endeavor involves critical emerging technology, evidence did not show national interest urgent enough to waive labor certification.
2 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsMay 2025Dismissed
An employer petitioned for an assistant vice president to receive EB-2 national interest waiver. The beneficiary met the advanced degree requirement but the AAO affirmed dismissal because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, showing only employer-specific benefits. The AAO did not address the remaining Dhanasar prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalMay 2025Remanded
Healthcare company petitioned for registered nurse as EB-3 skilled worker. AAO remanded because the record lacked regulatorily required audited financial statements evidencing ability to pay the proffered wage in the petition priority year 2024, and to clarify which entity would employ the beneficiary.
Read → - EB-2 NIWSports and athleticsMay 2025Dismissed
An airline pilot sought NIW for EB-2 to work as a pilot and flight instructor. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; the petitioner conflated the general importance of the aviation industry with a specific, nationally significant undertaking and did not explain how his work would positively impact the economy on a broad scale.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaMay 2025Dismissed
Engineer and researcher in clinical tissue engineering and transplantation seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver. AAO affirmed that petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor; education and publications insufficient without demonstrated record of success.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaMay 2025Dismissed
Science and chemistry teacher sought EB-2 NIW claiming endeavor to advance STEM education. AAO affirmed denial, holding classroom teaching activities, while meritorious, lack demonstrated impact on STEM education field broadly; importance of STEM field and teacher shortage insufficient without specific evidence of proposed endeavor national importance. Second and third prongs reserved.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMay 2025Dismissed
Employer sponsored beneficiary for EB-2 national interest waiver in product analytics using AI and machine learning. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance claim, holding that working in STEM or shortage occupations alone insufficient without broader prospective impacts to national economy.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - O-1AComputer science and AIMay 2025Dismissed
AI technology company petitioned for O-1A classification of chief technology officer. Beneficiary met only one criterion (judging); awards, membership, and published material criteria were not satisfied. Appeal dismissed because beneficiary could not meet minimum three criteria requirement for extraordinary ability.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2025Dismissed
Video game developer petitioned for senior animator as extraordinary ability in arts. SCOPS found beneficiary met one criterion (judging); AAO dismissed, holding beneficiary met only judging criterion and failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or elite status.
1 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsMay 2025Dismissed
Lead data engineer: employer-sponsored EB-2 with national interest waiver claim. Petitioner asserted cloud computing and AI work had national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national or global implications and benefited only specific employer; first prong failed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringMay 2025Remanded
An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineMay 2025Dismissed
Clinical research scientist in neurology sought EB-2 NIW for COVID-19 related research. SCOPS found substantial merit but not national importance; AAO affirmed. Petitioner failed to show how her specific proposed endeavor would have broader implications or significant prospective impact distinct from general field importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaApr 2025Sustained
A pharmaceutical researcher with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for nanotechnology drug delivery research targeting cancer and HIV. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor advances federal priorities, petitioner well-positioned through expertise and proven success, and waiver benefits U.S. public health.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
A swimming pool company executive with a master's degree in linguistic sciences sought EB-2 NIW classification. The petitioner's proposed endeavor was operating a swimming pool company. The AAO affirmed that work benefiting a single employer and its clients lacks national importance without demonstrating broader field implications or substantial economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
