Published AAO appeal decisions

Chemical and biomedical engineer with Ph.D. sought EB-2 classification and NIW. Petitioner established first prong of substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor. AAO agreed but found petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate record of success in related efforts, citations impact, or viable plan with documentary support for claimed employment.

Formulation scientist with Ph.D. seeks NIW for drug delivery systems research. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but concluded petitioner failed to demonstrate independence from employer, failing second prong.

Biochemistry graduate student seeks NIW waiver for antibiotic resistance research endeavor. Service center denied waiver, finding advanced degree established but national importance and waiver benefit not shown. AAO remanded for fuller analysis of Dhanasar prongs, noting service center overlooked expert letters and inadequately addressed evidence.

Postdoctoral fellow in biomedical research sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Proposed cancer research endeavor met substantial merit and national importance, but AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacking significant funded grant record, evidence of work adoption by others, or comprehensive future plan despite strong academic credentials.

A physician-researcher pursuing a Ph.D. in biomedical sciences seeks NIW for research on breast cancer biomarkers and early detection. The petitioner claimed three Dhanasar prongs. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well-positioned to advance it given his medical degree and publication record, and waiving job offer requirements would benefit the United States.

Biomedical engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification to conduct cell and gene therapy research. Meets all three Dhanasar prongs: proposed endeavor has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned through credentials and research record, and waiving job offer benefits the United States.

A cancer biology researcher with a Ph.D. sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to conduct research on targeted cancer therapies. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: the research has substantial merit and national importance, she is well positioned to advance it, and the waiver benefits the United States.

A chemist with Ph.D. in organic chemistry sought national interest waiver. AAO found she met the first two Dhanasar prongs but failed the third, concluding waiver was not warranted because her fellowship was time-limited, her citation metrics were deficient, and publication benefits were contingent on academic versus commercial employment.

A biostatistics researcher with a Ph.D. sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. He proposed research improving clinical trial design and quality-of-life studies. The AAO sustained his appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: substantial merit and national importance, well-positioned qualifications, and net benefit to the nation.