Published AAO appeal decisions

Electrical engineering researcher with advanced degree self-petitioner sought NIW for research in computational electromagnetics and integro-differential equations. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the United States.

Battery cell engineer with PhD seeks NIW. AAO found Director failed to adequately analyze evidence. AAO determined petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of clean energy research, was well-positioned to advance it, and that waiver would benefit the United States.

Dentist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner presented inconsistent and ambiguous descriptions of her proposed endeavor across multiple opportunities, failing to establish it sufficiently to analyze under any Dhanasar prong.

An environmental scientist with a master's degree in natural resources engineering sought EB-2 NIW classification based on research in urban water management and sustainability. The AAO agreed the research had substantial merit and national importance but found she was not well-positioned to advance it independently and had not shown benefit of waiver over labor certification. Appeal dismissed.

A postdoctoral researcher with a Ph.D. in horticulture sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to conduct research on HLB-resistant citrus. The Director found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded she was not well positioned and the waiver would not benefit the U.S. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied based on her expertise, documented successes, and significant horticultural and economic benefits.

A transportation researcher with advanced STEM degrees proposed continuing research on modeling tools and methodologies for transportation planning. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and national interest favors the waiver.

Psychological science researcher with Ph.D. sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance; petitioner is well positioned to advance it; waiver benefits U.S. interests.

Dental surgeon seeking NIW for advanced degree EB-2 to establish dental clinic. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance, petitioner not well positioned to advance it given focus on esthetician work, and labor shortage insufficient to balance waiver factors.

A database engineer with MBA sought NIW for freelance work and founding an online IT school. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance the online school despite having relevant experience and business background.

Medical researcher with Ph.D. sought national interest waiver after director found advanced degree eligibility. AAO held all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits United States based on her demonstrated expertise and contributions.

A professor and researcher with PhD sought EB-2 NIW for proposed research endeavor. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor had national importance, petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and waiver would benefit the United States.

A cancer biology researcher with a Ph.D. sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to conduct research on targeted cancer therapies. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: the research has substantial merit and national importance, she is well positioned to advance it, and the waiver benefits the United States.

Bioethicist with Ph.D. seeking NIW for university faculty and ethics consultation role. First prong met but second and third prongs failed because training was incomplete at filing, petitioner was not yet independent researcher, and lacked sufficient track record of successful research.

Biochemistry researcher sought NIW for EB-2 classification for brain tumor research. Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit and national importance of proposed research, strong qualifications to advance it, and past successful contributions. AAO held all three Dhanasar prongs met and waiver merited.

A dentist trained in Brazil sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional with a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the finding that the foreign degree was equivalent to a US doctorate and found the petitioner not well positioned to advance the endeavor because he lacked US licensure and was working as a dental assistant. Worker shortage alone does not support a waiver.

Civil engineer pursuing Ph.D. on risk-informed decision-making framework for energy generation claimed three Dhanasar prongs. AAO sustained appeal, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance with broad applications, the petitioner is well positioned by education and track record, and the waiver benefits the United States.

Environmental engineer with Ph.D. sought EB-2 with NIW. Proposed continued research on water quality and waste treatment. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance research, and on balance waiver benefits the United States.

Information systems manager sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to describe specific proposed endeavor with national importance, merely asserting occupation-level expertise; also failed to show waiver's balance favored United States.

A chemist with Ph.D. in organic chemistry sought national interest waiver. AAO found she met the first two Dhanasar prongs but failed the third, concluding waiver was not warranted because her fellowship was time-limited, her citation metrics were deficient, and publication benefits were contingent on academic versus commercial employment.

A data science researcher with a Ph.D. sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: the proposed research in data science algorithms and computing has national importance, the petitioner is well positioned through expertise and citations to advance it, and waiving labor certification benefits U.S. scientific interests.

A postdoctoral biochemistry researcher sought an NIW under Dhanasar for developing novel disease treatment derivatives. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research had substantial merit and national importance, petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and balance favored waiver of job offer requirement.

Civil engineer with doctoral degree seeking EB-2 NIW for infrastructure management research. Petitioner claimed all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO held all three met: research addresses national infrastructure concerns, petitioner is well-positioned through credentials and position, and national benefit from waiver outweighs certification interests.

Software developer with overseas experience sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held he failed to meet three exceptional ability criteria and failed first and third Dhanasar prongs, dismissing the appeal.

An anesthesiologist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Although qualified as advanced degree professional, the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to address the Director's findings on two dispositive Dhanasar prongs: national importance and balancing analysis, leaving these conclusions uncontested.

An ophthalmology researcher with advanced degrees sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for continued research on retinal diseases and treatments. The AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: her research has substantial merit and national importance, she is well positioned to advance it, and her contributions benefit the United States.