Published AAO appeal decisions

A geosteering researcher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement under Dhanasar framework. All three prongs were satisfied: substantial merit and national importance of research improving drilling operations, petitioner well positioned to advance work, and balance favors waiver. Appeal sustained.

A forensic scientist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree classification. The first Dhanasar prong was met: research in biomechanics has substantial merit and national importance. However, the AAO dismissed, finding insufficient evidence he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Physician researcher in pathology and cellular biology sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for hematological malignancy research. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well-positioned by experience and publication record, and waiver benefits U.S. healthcare interests.

Pediatric critical care physician sought EB-2 national interest waiver for clinical research role. AAO found her research had substantial merit and national importance, but concluded she was not well positioned to advance the work beyond patient care to impact the field broadly, denying the waiver.

A biostatistics researcher with a Ph.D. sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. He proposed research improving clinical trial design and quality-of-life studies. The AAO sustained his appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: substantial merit and national importance, well-positioned qualifications, and net benefit to the nation.

Ph.D. researcher in electrical engineering sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification with proposed soft electronics research. AAO found research had substantial merit and national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it; support letters and publications lacked demonstrated widespread influence or comparative success metrics. Appeal dismissed.

Trauma surgeon and cancer researcher seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed three Dhanasar prongs: substantial merit and national importance of breast cancer research, capability to advance it, and net benefit to United States. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three prongs satisfied by evidence of research impact and petitioner's demonstrated expertise.

An education researcher and assistant professor sought national interest waiver. The AAO found her research on remedial education had substantial merit and national importance, satisfying prong one. However, she failed prong two: her publications had minimal citations, no evidence of broader field impact, and no record of success in advancing the research, so no waiver was warranted.

Post-doctoral researcher in computer-aided drug discovery sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found proposed research had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal, holding petitioner not well-positioned to advance business endeavor; insufficient evidence of company interest or investor support.

An epidemiologist with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The decision found her proposed antimicrobial resistance research had substantial merit but lacked national importance and she lacked sufficient track record of impact to be well-positioned to advance it, failing the Dhanasar framework.

A high school science teacher sought EB-2 NIW classification to teach in rural North Dakota. Under Dhanasar, the petitioner proved well-positioned to advance science education but failed to demonstrate national importance; the work's benefit was local or state-level. The appeal was dismissed for failing the first prong.

Ophthalmologic researcher seeking NIW for EB-2 classification claimed research on retinopathy of prematurity has substantial merit and national importance. AAO found first prong met but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor through citation frequency, field-wide impact, or community interest.

Integrative medicine professional with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO found first Dhanasar prong met regarding research merit and national importance, but rejected petition after finding petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed research due to lack of success record or demonstrated interest from field.

A public health researcher with focus on cancer drug safety sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: proposed research on checkpoint inhibitor adverse effects has substantial merit and national importance; petitioner is well positioned based on past experience; waiver favors U.S. on balance. Appeal sustained.

Physician and neurology researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 based on mobile app development to improve stroke treatment. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because applicant failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the project through business experience or funding documentation.

Physician and neonatal researcher sought NIW for research on premature infant conditions. AAO found research met national importance prong but petitioner failed second prong: no demonstrated record of success or field impact through citations or clinical practice changes. Appeal dismissed.

CEO and founder of consumer electronics company sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. AAO found his entrepreneurial endeavor had substantial merit and he was well positioned to advance it, but insufficient evidence demonstrated national importance. Appeal dismissed because first prong unmet.

Aerospace engineer with advanced degrees in mathematics and engineering sought NIW. AAO found both proposed engineering and STEM teaching endeavors lacked national importance and he lacked sufficient record demonstrating he was well positioned to advance them. Appeal dismissed.

A postdoctoral researcher in cardiovascular medicine sought NIW based on advanced degree eligibility. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research into molecular treatments for heart disease and stroke has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it through demonstrated innovation and citations, and waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

A forensic DNA analyst sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional, proposing to continue laboratory work analyzing DNA evidence. The AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit but lacking national importance since her laboratory work does not demonstrate impact beyond her employer or broader contributions to forensic science advancement.

A postdoctoral researcher sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for research on neuron cell biology and nanotechnology-based medical devices. The AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: substantial merit and national importance, researcher well positioned to advance work, and balance favoring waiver. Appeal sustained.

Research and development engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established advanced degree and was well positioned to advance proposed engineering and software work. However, failed to demonstrate prospective impact beyond company clients sufficient for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A supply chain analyst with advanced degrees sought EB-2 national interest waiver for statistical analysis and traffic route optimization work. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance as impact was limited to the petitioner's company, not the field broadly, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

A social protection specialist sought NIW for EB-2 classification based on international development work in Egypt and Yemen. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of social protection initiatives, positioning to advance them, and that waiver benefits the US. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied.

Minister in community development sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal as abandoned for failure to respond to RFE. Alternatively, held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability and did not meet any prong of the Dhanasar national interest waiver framework.