Published AAO appeal decisions

Computer scientist with Ph.D. in computer and information engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 to conduct machine learning and optimization research. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied because SCOPS misconstrued proposed endeavor and undervalued contributions to critical STEM technology advancement.

A research and design engineer supporting U.S. defense and aerospace industries sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found his proposed endeavor has national importance, he is well positioned to advance it through relevant education and experience, and the balance favors waiver given strategic national interests.

AI researcher sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on information retrieval and natural language processing. SCOPS initially approved then revoked. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner established national importance of endeavor, demonstrated requisite expertise, and proved waiver would benefit the United States.

Computer scientist researching AI applications in healthcare sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed work on multimodal AI systems addressing healthcare transparency. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance with global implications, applicant well positioned via expertise and prior government-funded research, and waiver beneficial to U.S. on balance given national security and competitiveness implications.

A software developer specializing in 3D digital scanning since 1998, working as CTO for a major dental scanning company, sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found three criteria met and, reviewing the record holistically, determined the evidence established sustained national acclaim and top-tier status. Appeal sustained.

An artificial intelligence researcher with master's and Ph.D. degrees sought EB-2 NIW classification to advance machine learning algorithms for power system security. The AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: national importance of the endeavor, applicant's positioning, and net benefit to the United States. Appeal sustained.

An artificial intelligence researcher with a master's degree seeks NIW for research on machine learning techniques for privacy and autonomous model updating. Claimed all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO sustained appeal, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner is well-positioned through publications and patents, and waiving job offer would benefit U.S. technological advancement.

A research scientist pursuing a Ph.D. in advanced computing sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research in machine learning and process optimization has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well-positioned to advance it given his expertise and track record, and waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

Technology engineer and entrepreneur seeking EB-1A classification claimed published material, original contributions, and leading roles at distinguished companies. AAO found three criteria met and confirmed sustained national and international acclaim and recognition, placing petitioner in small percentage at top of field.

An AI technology entrepreneur and CEO sought EB-1A classification. The service center found two of five claimed criteria met; the AAO found a third criterion satisfied (original contributions through patents). The AAO concluded the petitioner demonstrated sustained national acclaim and exceptional status in the field, sustaining the appeal.

Computer science researcher sought national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of system software research, capability to advance it, and favorable balance for U.S. benefit. AAO sustained, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met based on documented research impact and expertise.

A specialist in intelligent transportation research and associate professor sought EB-1A in sciences. The petitioner met three criteria (judging, scholarly articles, original contributions) and demonstrated sustained national acclaim at the very top of the field. The AAO sustained the appeal.

A computer scientist appealed a denial after submitting additional evidence of high salary on appeal. The AAO found three criteria met: judging, scholarly articles, and high salary. Final merits determination confirmed extraordinary ability through demonstrated expertise at top of field.