Published AAO appeal decisions

Assistant professor of international studies sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Director approved first prong but denied second prong. AAO reversed, withdrawing national importance finding due to vague endeavor description and unclear future employment, and affirmed failure on second prong regarding positioning.

Marketing manager sought NIW based on EB-2 exceptional ability. AAO found she qualified for underlying EB-2 but dismissed NIW appeal because she materially changed her proposed endeavor from marketing management to business ownership and autism-related services, and failed to identify a specific, coherent endeavor with national importance.

A chemical engineer sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification because the record lacked evidence of requisite academic credentials and progressive employment experience, making the waiver issue moot.

Entrepreneur with environmental sustainability focus seeks NIW under exceptional ability classification. Proposed business combines recycling with farm consulting services. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the endeavor lacked sufficient specificity, detail, and evidence of national importance; inconsistencies in proposal unaddressed.

A general manager with an advanced degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business consulting venture in mergers, acquisitions, and foreign direct investment. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite stated job creation intentions, as evidence showed limited prospective impact beyond immediate clientele.

Nursing coordinator sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed expertise in nursing coordination and healthcare management benefiting hospitals and patients. AAO found the specific endeavor lacked national importance, affecting only the employer and patients, not the broader field or economy as required.

Marketing management specialist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner initially proposed marketing manager position but changed proposed endeavor to social media marketing company CEO in RFE response without explanation. Appeal dismissed because material changes to proposed endeavor prevented analysis of Dhanasar framework.

Finance executive in oil and gas industry seeking NIW under EB-2. Petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification. AAO agreed her proposed work has substantial merit and she is well positioned to advance it, but found the endeavor lacks national importance: her financial management work would benefit only her employer, not the broader industry. Appeal dismissed.

A systems engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for advanced degree. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied the first Dhanasar prong regarding substantial merit and national importance but failed the second prong: insufficient evidence he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A mechanical and aerospace engineer with Ph.D. sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The AAO found his proposed research had substantial merit and national importance. However, he failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the research because his education alone was insufficient and citation statistics and letters did not show personal research impact on the field.

A post-doctoral research associate in entomology sought NIW for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient specificity and documented broader impact; prior publication citations and speaking engagements do not establish that future teaching, mentoring, and research would impact the field nationally rather than only serve local students and institutions.

Marketing manager with advanced degree sought NIW waiver for EB-2 classification to operate marketing companies. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong; petitioner's marketing services, though valuable to his clients, do not extend beyond his companies and clientele to impact field or economy nationally.

Petitioner sought classification as advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability plus NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility; did not meet criteria for exceptional ability, and NIW analysis therefore not reached.

Civil engineer with two master's degrees sought EB-2 national interest waiver for proposed construction consulting work. Qualifies as advanced degree holder but failed to establish national importance of endeavor. Petitioner showed only localized client benefits without broader field advancement or significant economic impact.

Athlete sought NIW for EB-2 as exceptional ability professional. Petitioner claimed national team membership, awards, and competition history. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to meet underlying EB-2 eligibility criteria (did not satisfy three of six exceptional ability criteria). Dhanasar prongs reserved as analysis unnecessary without qualifying basis.

General and operations professional with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, holding proposed plant management and operations consulting work has substantial merit but lacks national importance; insufficient evidence of economic benefit beyond specific company and clients.

Journeyman power lineman claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver under EB-2. AAO found petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria; lacked official academic records from qualifying institutions and failed to meet salary or recognition standards.

Acupotomy researcher and clinician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed clinical work. Qualifies as individual of exceptional ability. AAO held endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to specific patients and locations without demonstrated broader implications for healthcare field or quality of life broadly.

Structural engineer seeking NIW as assistant professor and researcher. Proposed endeavor materially changed after filing from researcher role to professor-researcher hybrid; national importance not established; petitioner failed to address director's conclusions on appeal.

Project engineer sought NIW for EB-2. Service Center approved advanced degree but denied NIW. AAO dismissed because proposed roadway safety endeavor lacked sufficient detail and national importance; no direct connection established between specific endeavor and broader implications.

Business management consultant sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW to operate consulting firm facilitating U.S.-Brazil business expansion. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed first Dhanasar prong; proposed endeavor of four to eight direct employees lacks national importance and broader implications required for substantial positive economic effect.

Athletic trainer qualified as individual of exceptional ability but sought national interest waiver for fitness startup company. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks national importance; hiring eleven workers and local client services insufficient to demonstrate broader implications required by Dhanasar framework.

Senior vice president of real estate and interior design company seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of real estate development and interior design services. AAO found substantial merit but no national importance; work lacks sufficient economic impact or broader field implications warranting national interest waiver.

Mechanical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver for postdoctoral research position in aerospace technology. Qualifies as advanced degree holder but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor. Record did not demonstrate how technology advances broader field or has meaningful economic implications.

Travel management specialist seeking NIW for self-employed tourism consulting business. Claimed national importance in tourism industry. AAO dismissed because proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; general industry significance does not establish applicant's specific business has national impact beyond limited clientele.