AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
2,864 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsSep 2025Dismissed
Finance manager filed combined motions to reopen and reconsider a dismissed NIW appeal. AAO found motion to reconsider untimely under regulations; motion to reopen also untimely, and even if excused, contained no evidence of national importance of proposed work, the dispositive issue in prior dismissal. Both motions dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsSep 2025Dismissed
Fintech entrepreneur seeks EB-2 with NIW claiming exceptional ability. AAO found petitioner met only one of six regulatory criteria despite service center's unsupported claim of three criteria. Final merits review confirmed lack of expertise significantly above ordinary level in finance. NIW not addressed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherSep 2025Dismissed
A self-petitioner sought a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement. The service center found he qualified for the underlying classification but denied the waiver. On appeal, the AAO dismissed because the signatures on the appeal form and the representation form appeared electronically copied and not valid original handwritten signatures. The merits were not reached.
Read → - EB-2 NIWChemistry and materialsSep 2025Dismissed
Chemist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on biochemical processes for medical and energy applications. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks established national importance due to vague, inconsistent, and expansive claims. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AISep 2025Dismissed
Cybersecurity academy founder and CEO sought EB-2 NIW. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance; consulting activities insufficient in scale and impact to affect field, economy, or national security broadly.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A business continuity planner seeks EB-2 NIW based on exceptional ability and national interest. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks demonstrated national importance because support for Latino small businesses lacks sufficient prospective economic impact or field-wide implications, and the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringSep 2025Dismissed
Construction manager and civil engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed the fifth motion to reopen and reconsider on procedural grounds: petitioner failed to establish new facts warranting reopening or show erroneous law or policy application. Merits were not addressed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringSep 2025Dismissed
Automotive engineer seeking NIW for startup consulting company. Claimed national importance through workforce upskilling and STEM education. AAO dismissed because specific endeavor lacks national importance; industry importance and general workforce education insufficient under Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementSep 2025Dismissed
A travel and tourism company executive sought extraordinary ability classification, but this decision is an EB-1A matter rather than a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not meet at least three evidentiary criteria, and it reserved the remaining prospective-benefit issue.
Read → - EB-2 NIWOtherAug 2025Dismissed
Advanced degree professional sought NIW for EB-2 as commercial pilot, flight instructor, and consultant. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance prong, concluding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient breadth or impact to benefit national economy as required by Dhanasar framework. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2025Remanded
A biochemist with a Ph.D. in Korean integrative medicine seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but remanded because SCOPS inadequately analyzed the petitioner's h-index, citations, publications, and recommendations for the second prong.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIAug 2025Dismissed
An entrepreneur and computer systems engineer sought NIW classification to operate an IT services company. The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the venture's national importance or that a waiver would benefit the United States, and also lacked advanced degree credentials as initially claimed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2025Dismissed
Business management consultant with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong. Business plan projections and service to minority-owned small businesses insufficient to demonstrate broader economic or sectoral impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2025Dismissed
A postdoctoral medical researcher with Ph.D. sought EB-2 national interest waiver for machine learning research on disease diagnosis and treatment. The AAO dismissed, holding that despite meeting the first prong, she failed the second prong: no secured funding, primarily collaborative research background, and insufficient evidence of independent success or detailed plan for future activities.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2025Dismissed
Doctoral researcher in microbiology and bioinformatics sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed research endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and petitioner was well-positioned to advance it, but dismissed motion to reconsider because petitioner failed to demonstrate expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered in field.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringAug 2025Dismissed
An automotive engineer seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver to develop advanced safety features for vehicles. He claimed impact on road safety and public health but failed to establish broader field applications or how the endeavor transcends organizational level impact. The AAO dismissed the appeal.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIAug 2025Remanded
An advanced degree professional in a STEM field proposes an endeavor with substantial merit and national importance. The AAO remanded because the service center improperly analyzed whether the petitioner is well-positioned to advance the endeavor and failed to adequately explain the balance-of-benefits analysis under Dhanasar.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2025Dismissed
A postdoctoral medical researcher seeks NIW for EB-2 to continue postdoctoral research. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it; she plays a support role, lacks demonstrated funding, and has limited research impact.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsAug 2025Dismissed
Financial advisor and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver proposes to grow small and medium-sized enterprises and improve tax systems. AAO held she lacked advanced degree eligibility; also did not establish national importance of the specific endeavor, as projections were uncorroborated and methods lacked demonstrated innovation or broader field implications.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMechanical and aerospace engineeringAug 2025Dismissed
Mechanical engineer researcher self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 for thermal battery development research. AAO affirmed first prong met but reversed on second prong, finding PhD degree and citations insufficient to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalJul 2025Dismissed
A chief executive officer with a medical degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW for a healthcare startup. The proposed endeavor met substantial merit but lacked demonstrated national importance. Projections lacked detail; techniques were not shown as sufficiently innovative or distinct; no broad field impact or employment of disadvantaged workers established.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringJul 2025Dismissed
Software developer sought NIW with advanced degree. Proposed autonomous vehicle safety research. AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed endeavor under Dhanasar second prong: master's degree and citations insufficient without prior funding, government interest, or validated model comparable to Dhanasar precedent. First and third prongs reserved.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherJul 2025Dismissed
Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaJul 2025Dismissed
Postdoctoral fellow in biomedical research sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Proposed cancer research endeavor met substantial merit and national importance, but AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacking significant funded grant record, evidence of work adoption by others, or comprehensive future plan despite strong academic credentials.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJul 2025Dismissed
An IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to establish a consultancy serving the pharmaceutical industry. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his business plan, though showing substantial merit, lacked sufficient evidence that the methodology had been adopted in industry or would significantly benefit the national economy.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
