Published AAO appeal decisions

Financial analyst and manager seeking EB-2 NIW to operate independent consulting company. Petitioner claimed endeavor would have national importance through job creation and improving financial reporting methodologies. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor; new material facts presented in response to RFE cannot establish eligibility.

Self-petitioner, production engineer in oil and gas industry, sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver for continuing role in industry. AAO found petitioner eligible for EB-2 but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. Appeal dismissed.

Quantitative analytics researcher with Ph.D. in economics sought EB-2 national interest waiver to develop novel mathematical models for economic forecasting. AAO found substantial merit and national importance but concluded she lacked sufficient record of success and demonstrated positioning to advance the endeavor, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

A private security specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. The AAO found the petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria, failing the threshold. Although analyzing Dhanasar as alternative, the AAO concluded the specific proposed endeavor in school emergency preparedness lacked national importance.

A commercial pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found he met fewer than three exceptional ability criteria, since a pilot association membership was not shown to be a professional association. It reserved the waiver question, so this is not a Dhanasar merits decision.

Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW for e-commerce accessory and clothing business claimed endeavor had national importance through job creation and sustainable practices. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it would impact only company employees and specific customers, not the industry broadly, and applicant failed to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at national level.

An economics professor sought national interest waiver to provide consulting to Latino-owned businesses. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacked clarity and demonstrable national importance. Vague intentions to assist small companies at unspecified stage did not establish broad field impact or substantial economic effects.

A financial advisor seeking EB-2 with NIW to operate an investment brokerage firm. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance as required under Dhanasar's first prong because no evidence demonstrated significant job creation, economic depression area impact, or broad prospective benefit to the United States.

English language arts teacher seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Claimed national importance through educational innovation and research at correctional facility. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance; impact remains localized to students and employer, lacking broader field implications required by Dhanasar.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed endeavor in financial consulting has substantial merit but lacks national importance as required by Dhanasar first prong. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed work would only benefit specific clientele, not impact industry or economy broadly.

Construction tradesman sought NIW for occupational health and safety consulting. AAO dismissed appeal because repeated material misrepresentations about the proposed endeavor vitiated eligibility, and even setting those aside, the endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance it.

Nuclear medicine technologist and medical physicist seeking NIW for EB-2 classification to pursue diagnostic medical physics residency and self-employment. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor and that waiver would benefit the United States, though substantial merit was established.

Pharmacist seeking NIW for advanced-degree EB-2. Claimed telepharmacy and medication delivery innovation endeavor demonstrates substantial merit addressing health disparities. AAO found substantial merit established but rejected national importance of petitioner's specific endeavor versus general field importance. Appeal dismissed.

A dentist seeking EB-2 NIW as entrepreneur failed to establish five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience through employer letters and failed to submit required labor certification form. Appeal dismissed on independent alternative grounds without reaching NIW analysis.

A physical therapist sought EB-2 NIW. Qualified for underlying EB-2 as advanced degree professional. Claimed innovative rehabilitation methods and insoles but lacked objective documentation. Specific endeavor lacks national importance; general patient care does not reach necessary impact level.

A competitive swimmer sought EB-1A classification. The director found two criteria met; the AAO added a third by recognizing team captain role within a division as qualifying. With three criteria satisfied, the matter was remanded for final merits analysis on sustained acclaim and top-tier status.

A fashion designer and entrepreneur claimed extraordinary ability through five criteria. The AAO found only two criteria met (published material and judging), concluded she did not meet the threshold of three criteria, and found insufficient sustained acclaim for the elite classification sought.

Theatrical producer seeking EB-1A classification. Met four of ten initial criteria (published material, display, leading role, commercial success) but failed final merits analysis. Director's decision lacked thorough evaluation of all evidence and did not adequately explain why achievements failed to demonstrate small percentage at field top. Remanded for complete final merits analysis.

Construction estimator seeking EB-2 NIW claimed proposed construction firm would address infrastructure and affordable housing. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance because the record does not establish substantial positive economic effects beyond the petitioner's company and clients.

A musician sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The petitioner claimed exceptional ability but failed to meet three of six regulatory criteria. The AAO found membership in Brazilian Musicians Association insufficient and contributions limited to personal performing and one education tool, lacking field-wide impact.

A mechanical engineer seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to work as construction manager in oil and gas sector. The AAO found substantial merit but no national importance, as the work lacks prospective impact beyond the employer and clients to broader industry implications.

Cancer research scientist sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed membership and original contributions criteria in addition to judging and scholarly articles already found met. AAO affirmed membership criterion was not satisfied and original contributions lacked required major significance. Overall, evidence did not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.

Swimmer self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three initial criteria but AAO affirmed dismissal, finding no sustained national or international acclaim; personal best times ranked outside top tier of global swimmers; national records insufficient to demonstrate top-tier recognition.

A business data engineer sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming several evidentiary criteria after the service center found none met. The AAO accepted the judging criterion but found membership and original contributions unmet. It dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

A micropigmentation makeup artist sought extraordinary ability classification in the arts. After an earlier summary dismissal of the appeal, she filed combined motions to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed them because no new fact showed the appeal had identified a specific error, and no misapplied law or policy was shown.