AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
12 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1AArts, design, architectureDec 2023Dismissed
A craftsperson from Russia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed membership in two art unions and a display criterion. The AAO found only display satisfied; the union memberships lacked evidence that outstanding achievements were judged by recognized experts. She failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.
1 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureDec 2023Dismissed
Composer and singer self-petitioner claiming extraordinary ability sought EB-1A. Claimed five criteria but did not address director's rejection on appeal, waiving the issue. Director found evidence insufficient for all claimed criteria. AAO also found material fraud: falsified award certificate and fabricated film project with falsified supporting documents. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet criteria threshold and willful misrepresentation.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2023Dismissed
A makeup artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed six criteria on appeal but provided insufficient evidence for awards, judging, publications, salary, and membership; one criterion was abandoned. The AAO dismissed, finding petitioner did not satisfy three criteria or demonstrate extraordinary ability.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2023Dismissed
A Bangladeshi writer claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, asserting six regulatory criteria including awards, membership, published material, judging, and exhibitions. The AAO dismissed the appeal after finding willful misrepresentation of material facts through falsified news articles and determining the petitioner did not meet the required three criteria.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2023Dismissed
Visual artist seeking extraordinary ability classification. Director found three criteria met; AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and place among very top of field despite meeting initial evidentiary threshold.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2023Dismissed
Artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification for studio and gallery work. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner met only one of ten required criteria and failed to demonstrate major award or sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureMay 2023Dismissed
A costume designer for athletes and performers seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only one of ten evidentiary criteria (exhibitions) and failed to demonstrate the three-criteria threshold or sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2023Dismissed
Pianist seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish either a major internationally recognized award or three alternate regulatory criteria. Evidence of local competition awards, professional memberships, and regional media appearance insufficient to demonstrate elite status.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2023Dismissed
A photographer and business owner from Brazil claimed extraordinary ability through seven criteria. The AAO found two criteria met: published material and exhibition display. However, the petitioner failed to establish three qualifying criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
2 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2023Dismissed
Fashion designer sought extraordinary ability classification claiming six criteria including awards, membership, and scholarly articles. AAO found only one criterion met (judging) and upheld dismissal. Petitioner failed to establish three-criterion threshold and lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureJan 2023Dismissed
Folk and classical singer from Armenia claimed eight criteria beyond those Director found met. AAO affirmed Director's finding of two criteria met but found petitioner failed to establish three criteria total required. Final merits analysis concluded no sustained national or international acclaim demonstrating top-tier status.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2023Dismissed
A fashion model from Australia sought EB-1A classification claiming ten evidentiary criteria. The AAO affirmed the service center's finding that she satisfied only one criterion (display at exhibitions). The record lacked evidence of nationally recognized awards, qualifying association membership, or the sustained national/international acclaim required for extraordinary ability status.
1 of 11 criteria metRead →
