Published AAO appeal decisions

A management and financial analyst sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business venture. The AAO dismissed her second motion to reopen and reconsider because she submitted no new facts or evidence, and her contentions reasserted already-rejected arguments without establishing legal or policy error in prior decisions.

Business and marketing professional seeking NIW as EB-2. Motions submitted articles on small business economic importance and job-creation multipliers. AAO held first prong failed because industry importance differs from specific endeavor importance; claimed job creation projections lack foundation and do not reach substantial positive economic effects.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. The AAO upheld dismissal because she failed to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria (no qualifying license, insufficient years of experience, insufficient salary, no professional membership). The NIW merits were not addressed.

A business administrator with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed consulting endeavor. Work would benefit direct clients only without broader industry impact. Appeal dismissed under first Dhanasar prong.