Published AAO appeal decisions

An oil and gas industry consultant with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. He claimed his proposed consulting work would benefit the U.S. energy sector. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his endeavor lacked national importance and benefited only his employer and clients, not the broader industry or economy.

A geophysicist engineer seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish U.S. equivalency of foreign advanced degree, thus lacking underlying EB-2 qualification; proposed endeavor also lacks demonstrated national importance.

A petroleum engineer seeking NIW claimed ability to advance research on artificial lift technology. The AAO found the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but dismissed the appeal because the engineer's publications, citations, education, and journal service did not demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the specific research.

A petroleum engineer sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The director accepted the advanced degree and substantial merit but found national importance lacking. The AAO adopted that decision and dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence the work would affect the industry beyond the employer or produce substantial economic effects, and reserved the other prongs.

A postdoctoral researcher in geology and environmental science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO accepted advanced degree status but dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor was vague and inconsistent, so national importance was not shown under the first Dhanasar prong, and the other prongs were not reached.

A well control instructor sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional and that the proposed endeavor had substantial merit, but the specific work lacked national importance beyond the employer and its contractors.