AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
596 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateMar 2023Sustained
Battery cell engineer with PhD seeks NIW. AAO found Director failed to adequately analyze evidence. AAO determined petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of clean energy research, was well-positioned to advance it, and that waiver would benefit the United States.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureMar 2023Dismissed
Graphic designer self-petitioner claimed national interest waiver under EB-2. AAO affirmed denial on two grounds: petitioner failed to establish equivalency to U.S. advanced degree, and proposed business endeavor lacks national importance or broader economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureMar 2023Dismissed
Vocalist and music teacher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for endeavor of musical event management and classical music teaching. AAO affirmed underlying EB-2 eligibility but found proposed activities lacked national importance, distinguishing from STEM teaching precedent by showing no broad industry impact. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSports and athleticsMar 2023Dismissed
Youth soccer academy petitioned to employ a soccer coach as an EB-2 beneficiary with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because the coach's youth coaching endeavor lacked national importance; recommendations showed coaching excellence but not prospective impact at industry scale required by Dhanasar.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur with twelve years business and technology experience seeks EB-2 NIW. Claimed business development and real estate technology solutions have national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite having substantial merit; low business revenue and absence of broader implications fail to demonstrate national benefit.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMarketing, media, communicationsMar 2023Dismissed
Marketing professional with Brazilian tourism experience seeks national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner initially proposed general marketing work, then introduced new business plan at RFE stage. AAO found impermissible material change and held original endeavor lacks national importance. Work would not impact field or economy beyond specific employer clientele.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
An entrepreneur owning pizza restaurant chains sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, affirming the director's denial; though the endeavor had substantial merit and job creation potential, it failed to demonstrate national importance as required under Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBiotech and pharmaMar 2023Sustained
Biocompatibility material scientist with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. Petitioner demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: proposed wound care research has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned with advanced degrees and expertise, and waiver benefits U.S. interests. Appeal sustained.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherMar 2023Dismissed
A commercial pilot seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. AAO held that pilot's evidence—flight school completion, licensing, and employer letters—did not demonstrate exceptional ability as regulatory standard requires; salary evidence post-dated filing and lacked context.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
Employer-sponsored human resources manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish national importance of her specific HR endeavor; general HR shortage and field importance do not meet Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWMarketing, media, communicationsMar 2023Dismissed
Marketing manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found advanced degree eligibility established. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance; no evidence of projected economic impact or job creation at national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaMar 2023Dismissed
IT instructor with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to provide IT training and workforce development to reduce crime and close digital divide. AAO dismissed appeal, holding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; teaching students does not demonstrate broader impact on IT field or substantial economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringMar 2023Dismissed
Civil engineer with five years experience sought EB-2 NIW. Qualified as advanced degree professional. AAO found proposed highway and bridge infrastructure work lacked national importance; emphasis on industry significance insufficient. Petitioner's customized solutions not shown to differ from existing U.S. approaches or impact field broadly.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
HR manager petitioner self-filed for EB-2 with NIW, proposing HR consulting services for small and medium enterprises. AAO dismissed on two grounds: petitioner lacked five years of required post-baccalaureate experience in HR specialty, and proposed endeavor lacks national importance because general information about labor shortages and small business does not establish this specific business will have broader implications beyond its limited clients.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsMar 2023Dismissed
Attorney and international tax consultant with advanced degree seeking EB-2 NIW for self-employment in tax consulting. Met underlying advanced degree classification but failed first Dhanasar prong because specific endeavor lacked national importance. Creating eight jobs and tax revenue insufficient to establish substantial prospective impact warranting waiver.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWAgriculture and foodMar 2023Dismissed
A food innovation consultant with advanced degrees sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO agreed with the Director that the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional with substantial merit, but held that her proposed food consulting and teaching activities lacked national importance, failing the first Dhanasar prong.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
A product manager with master's degrees in international business and marketing seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed denial because while the endeavor has substantial merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance as the proposed work lacks prospective impact beyond his employer.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
Retail entrepreneur seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed three Dhanasar prongs but submitted only general professional plan without specific U.S. business establishment plans. AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated, failing first prong. Second and third prongs not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
Operations and administrative manager with business degree seeks NIW for frozen-food business and consulting work. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and insufficient detail; unresolved time allocation issues cast doubt on economic impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalMar 2023Dismissed
Surgical technologist specialist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO found her proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance as required by Dhanasar; benefits were limited to specific patients and employer rather than advancing the field or nation broadly.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalMar 2023Dismissed
A pharmacist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance of providing pharmacy services to underserved populations. The decision held that individual patient care activities, while valuable, lack the broader field impact and substantial economic effects required.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
A general and operations manager sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification, proposing to provide expert managerial services to U.S. companies. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the specific endeavor lacks national importance; it would benefit only individual employers and clients, not the broader field or economy.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMar 2023Dismissed
Information security specialist sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found his proposed work in IT consulting and cybersecurity has substantial merit but lacks national importance because no documentary evidence shows broader field impact beyond employer benefit. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringMar 2023Dismissed
Civil and mechanical engineer in transportation specialization claims national interest waiver for university research endeavor. AAO found insufficient detail regarding national importance; grant funding and projects postdated filing; no evidence of broad field implications beyond local academic work. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2023Dismissed
A general and operations manager seeks EB-2 NIW as individual of exceptional ability. The petitioner claimed multiple exceptional ability criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding petitioner did not satisfy three of six criteria required for exceptional ability, eliminating NIW eligibility.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
