Published AAO appeal decisions

Petitioner seeking national interest waiver for Yoruba heritage and language education program submitted business plan projecting job creation and program expansion. AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance, affecting only students rather than the field broadly, and petitioner not well-positioned given limited teaching credentials relative to comparators.

Archaeologist with Egyptian Ph.D. in Islamic archaeology seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for research comparing African American and Mamluk civilizations. First prong met; teaching and media production endeavors lacked sufficient specificity. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed second prong: education alone insufficient to show well-positioned status without demonstrated research success or external support.

Linguistics researcher with advanced degree sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. AAO found research endeavor nationally important but dismissed because petitioner not well-positioned to advance it; limited citations and lack of institutional support insufficient; prong three not reached.

An educator and entrepreneur sought NIW as EB-2. The service center approved the endeavor's national importance but denied the petition finding insufficient evidence of qualifications, viable business planning, or stakeholder support. The AAO affirmed, holding the petitioner not well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor under Dhanasar's second prong.

Historian with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for expert witness services and market analysis. AAO affirmed denial, finding proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance: no evidence of broader impact, economic effects, or industry innovations required by Dhanasar first prong.

Teaching assistant and researcher in instructional design and technology sought EB-2 with NIW for research in AR/VR educational applications. The AAO affirmed denial, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance and petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it beyond university impact.

A system engineer with a doctorate in management science and engineering seeks EB-2 classification and national interest waiver to operate a digitized international online university. He submitted published articles and job announcements as evidence of positioning. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he failed the second prong: his earlier research and cited positions lack sufficient connection to the proposed university endeavor, and the university itself exists only in planning stages.

Spanish language educator seeks national interest waiver for unspecified EB-2 employment-based classification. AAO held applicant failed to reliably identify and clearly demonstrate ability to advance proposed endeavor under Dhanasar second prong, so waiver denied.

Researcher and music instructor seeks NIW for EB-2 classification for research documenting Assyrian cultural heritage and music. Petitioner demonstrated all three Dhanasar prongs: proposed research has national importance, petitioner uniquely qualified with rare language expertise and academic distinction, and waiver benefits U.S. by preserving underrepresented cultural scholarship.

A qualitative researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claiming to advance education research on mental health and student behavior. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner lacked sufficient academic research experience, had no meaningful citation record, and provided only general plans without credible detail or demonstrated progress toward the proposed endeavor.

Information technology instructor seeking NIW for continued STEM education work. Claimed national importance based on government STEM policy alignment and recognition as top instructor. AAO affirmed denial, finding substantial merit but no national importance; instructor status and top performer recognition insufficient without demonstrating broader impact on IT or STEM education fields.