Published AAO appeal decisions

Electronics engineer sought EB-2 NIW to develop and market medical smartphone applications. AAO reversed on first prong, finding national importance established, but upheld denial on second prong: insufficient evidence of success in app development, no prior related business experience, and post-filing customer interest letters undermined preparedness claim.

An electrical engineer sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a self-employed consultancy in oil and gas. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the engineer's expertise and work, while valuable, lacked evidence of national importance, broader field implications, or substantial economic benefit required by Dhanasar.

Electrical engineering researcher with advanced degree self-petitioner sought NIW for research in computational electromagnetics and integro-differential equations. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the United States.

An electrical engineer with a master's degree in engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 as self-petitioner. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of his research endeavor but dismissed because he failed to show he is well positioned to advance it; his temporary Ph.D. student position, prospective postdoc role, and published work lacked demonstrated impact on field.

Electrical engineering researcher employed in semiconductor development sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed three Dhanasar prongs. AAO sustained appeal, finding proposed next-generation semiconductor research has national importance, petitioner is well-positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits U.S. interests.