Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-petitioner, electrical engineer with Ph.D., seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 to develop computer-aided design tools for IC packaging design. Petitioner holds advanced STEM degree but failed to establish being well-positioned to advance proposed research; lacked specificity linking past work to endeavor and did not demonstrate field impact or funding generation comparable to precedent.

A researcher with a master's degree in electrical engineering sought EB-2 NIW for research in wireless charging technology for smartphones. The AAO confirmed the advanced degree requirement and substantial merit but rejected the petition because uncorroborated expert assertions about national importance were insufficient; the technology's impact was limited to employer, licensees, and customers, not national impact.

Postdoctoral candidate in electrical engineering with Master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research in machine learning applications. AAO affirmed Service Center denial, finding endeavor has national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it, lacking sufficient evidence of field influence or relevant party interest.

An electrical engineering Ph.D. candidate sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on power electronics for renewable energy. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance it via her research record and impact.

Semiconductor company petitioning for beneficiary as EB-2 professional with advanced degree for graphics and compute product optimization research. Director found endeavor of substantial merit and national importance but beneficiary lacks advanced degree (Ph.D.) and demonstrated track record of success in proposed research area, failing second prong.

Electrical engineer claiming EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO agreed first prong met but found petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance proposed research endeavor, lacking evidence of grant funding, significant research impact, or specific future plan. Appeal dismissed.