Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-petitioner, professor in Nigeria with Ph.D., proposed research on nanostructured materials to remove contaminants and microplastics from water for treatment and desalination. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: research has national importance for U.S. water quality; petitioner well positioned to advance with relevant expertise and track record.

A researcher with a master's in power engineering sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for endeavor developing sustainable integrated power systems. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor despite the proposed work having national importance; education alone does not establish positioning.

A climate scientist sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found the endeavor of improving climate models has substantial merit and national importance, meeting the first prong. However, the petitioner failed to establish he is well-positioned to advance it, and the balance prong was not reached. Appeal dismissed.

Environmental consultant with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2. First prong established but failed second prong: no demonstrated environmental consulting skills, business formation steps, or evidence of customer interest despite business plan and language fluency. Appeal dismissed.

Real estate developer sought EB-2 with NIW for home building and remodeling using green technologies and sustainable practices. Director found endeavor nationally important; AAO reversed, finding vague strategy lacking prospective impact and petitioner not adequately positioned. Appeal dismissed on two independent bases.

Researcher in waste conversion for energy storage seeking NIW under EB-2. Claimed eligibility under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed endeavor due to lack of business plan, documented progress, or evidence of customer or investor support.