Published AAO appeal decisions

Nutritionist seeking NIW with advanced degree. Petitioner materially changed proposed endeavor between filing and RFE response, shifting focus and field; inconsistent information prevented conclusion that she meets first or second Dhanasar prong.

Acupotomy researcher and clinician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed clinical work. Qualifies as individual of exceptional ability. AAO held endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to specific patients and locations without demonstrated broader implications for healthcare field or quality of life broadly.

Gastroenterologist sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research endeavor but failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it through sufficient record of success, impact, or progress. Appeal dismissed.

A dentist trained in Brazil sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional with a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the finding that the foreign degree was equivalent to a US doctorate and found the petitioner not well positioned to advance the endeavor because he lacked US licensure and was working as a dental assistant. Worker shortage alone does not support a waiver.

A cardiologist and director seeking NIW under EB-2 claimed substantial merit and national importance for clinical work, teaching, and leadership. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; clinical impact limited to individual workplace. Petitioner also failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance endeavor.

Senior research associate with advanced degree in medical data statistics sought NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed research had national importance but petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance it despite citations and peer review work.