AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
112 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineJan 2024Sustained
Vascular researcher with Ph.D. in medical cell biology seeking EB-2 NIW. Proposed advancing critical bioinformatics and biomechanical research. AAO sustained, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver would benefit US.
3 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsJan 2024Dismissed
Entrepreneur seeking to provide financial services to institutions applied for EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well-positioned to advance it. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsJan 2024Dismissed
An accountant with advanced degree sought NIW for self-employment in accounting services. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and national importance, and the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it with only vague plans and no documented progress.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSports and athleticsJan 2024Dismissed
Skydiving instructor sought NIW but did not qualify for EB-2 as advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability. Met only one of six exceptional ability criteria (license/certification). AAO held endeavor lacked national importance due to absence of quantified economic impact demonstration.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIJan 2024Dismissed
IT analyst and entrepreneur sought EB-2 national interest waiver to develop an IT venture. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor, lacking sufficient educational credentials, customer or investor interest, and early operational progress despite meeting the substantial merit prong.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJan 2024Dismissed
An entrepreneur with advanced degree sought NIW to lead financial consulting and loan services business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite general importance of entrepreneurs, and petitioner not well positioned to advance it.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementJan 2024Dismissed
An entrepreneur in business coaching sought EB-2 NIW classification. She had an advanced degree and registered business status but provided limited evidence of past business success, a viable business model, or customer interest in her proposed online training courses. The AAO affirmed that she failed the second prong, finding her not well-positioned to advance her endeavor.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academia2024Dismissed
A qualitative researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claiming to advance education research on mental health and student behavior. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner lacked sufficient academic research experience, had no meaningful citation record, and provided only general plans without credible detail or demonstrated progress toward the proposed endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinical2024Dismissed
A dentist sought EB-2 NIW to operate a dental clinic with training programs. On motion to reopen, the AAO found she failed all three Dhanasar prongs: no national importance, not well positioned to advance the endeavor, and no net benefit to the United States from waiver.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLaw, policy, social science2024Dismissed
An attorney sought EB-2 NIW for a proposed mediation and conciliation company. The AAO affirmed dismissal of motions to reopen, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial merit and national importance of her specific endeavor, and that she was not well-positioned to advance it beyond industry-wide importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWAgriculture and food2024Dismissed
Researcher with advanced degree proposes endeavor on mathematical modeling for food safety and water pollution. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research. Failed second prong: published work heavily self-cited, lacking independent recognition from relevant parties needed to show capacity to advance endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academia2024Dismissed
Information technology instructor seeking NIW for continued STEM education work. Claimed national importance based on government STEM policy alignment and recognition as top instructor. AAO affirmed denial, finding substantial merit but no national importance; instructor status and top performer recognition insufficient without demonstrating broader impact on IT or STEM education fields.
1 of 3 criteria metRead →
