Published AAO appeal decisions

A research scientist in experimental nuclear physics sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but found the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it based on education, skills, and record of success. Appeal dismissed without reaching the balancing prong.

A physician-researcher pursuing a Ph.D. in biomedical sciences seeks NIW for research on breast cancer biomarkers and early detection. The petitioner claimed three Dhanasar prongs. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner is well-positioned to advance it given his medical degree and publication record, and waiving job offer requirements would benefit the United States.

A computer science lecturer and network consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research and academic roles. The AAO affirmed denial based on failure to demonstrate the petitioner was well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; insufficient evidence of funded research or meaningful field impact.

Petitioner seeking national interest waiver for Yoruba heritage and language education program submitted business plan projecting job creation and program expansion. AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance, affecting only students rather than the field broadly, and petitioner not well-positioned given limited teaching credentials relative to comparators.

A physicist with a Ph.D. in physics and astronomy sought EB-2 NIW for proposed research. The AAO affirmed dismissal on the second Dhanasar prong. Though the petitioner met the first prong (substantial merit and national importance of the endeavor), he did not demonstrate sufficient qualifications, funding history, or independent research leadership to be well positioned to advance it.

A mechanical engineer and researcher with doctorate pursuing research on electric motor efficiency and AI integration. The AAO found the first prong met as the research addresses critical emerging technologies, but dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate institutional interest or funding securing his well-positioning to advance the research.

A medical scientist with a Ph.D. sought EB-2 NIW for autoimmune disease research under Dhanasar framework. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit but the petitioner lacked positioning to advance it: insufficient funding, no detailed plan for future work, and no demonstrated progress toward the proposed endeavor.

Self-petitioner, professor in Nigeria with Ph.D., proposed research on nanostructured materials to remove contaminants and microplastics from water for treatment and desalination. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: research has national importance for U.S. water quality; petitioner well positioned to advance with relevant expertise and track record.

Data scientist with doctorate in earth science sought EB-2 NIW for climate change research using dynamical theories and data analysis. Met all three Dhanasar prongs: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and balance favors waiver given STEM expertise and contributions.

A quality control manager sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it. Hospitality experience did not support consulting business claims without demonstrated progress or contracts.

Biomedical engineer researcher proposed postdoctoral research on brain cognitive processes using machine learning. AAO withdrew denial of prong one, finding national importance, but affirmed denial under prong two because petitioner lacked demonstrated influence or record of success advancing the field.

Archaeologist with Egyptian Ph.D. in Islamic archaeology seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for research comparing African American and Mamluk civilizations. First prong met; teaching and media production endeavors lacked sufficient specificity. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed second prong: education alone insufficient to show well-positioned status without demonstrated research success or external support.

Linguistics researcher with advanced degree sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. AAO found research endeavor nationally important but dismissed because petitioner not well-positioned to advance it; limited citations and lack of institutional support insufficient; prong three not reached.

An industrial engineer postdoctoral researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver for supply chain research. The AAO reversed the Director on national importance, finding alignment with government priorities and field implications. However, the petitioner failed the second prong: insufficient evidence of personal record of success or influence establishing he could advance the endeavor.

A risk manager with advanced degree seeking EB-2 classification with NIW to develop AI-based fraud detection algorithms. The AAO found the first prong met but dismissed because petitioner lacks entrepreneurship and algorithm development experience, failing to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A dentist-scientist with a Ph.D. sought EB-2 NIW status for dental research focused on underserved populations. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding although the endeavor had national importance, the beneficiary was not well-positioned to advance it due to lacking employment, institutional support, or documented steps toward pursuing the proposed research position.

An inorganic chemist sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for research in carbon-capturing metal-organic frameworks. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: the research has national importance for ecological sustainability, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it with her doctoral expertise and peer recognition, and waiving labor certification serves the national interest.

Electrical engineer and medical imaging researcher with Ph.D. in ultrasound diagnostic analysis sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed research has broad field implications. AAO sustained, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance demonstrated, well-positioned given Ph.D. and track record, and U.S. balance favored waiver.

An assistant professor and researcher in finance and economics with a PhD seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner proposed developing machine learning techniques for finance applications. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner is well-positioned to advance it through his education and experience, and waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

Electrical and computer engineering researcher with master's degree sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed research endeavor has national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it.

Entrepreneur in finance seeks NIW. Claimed endeavor important for U.S. competitiveness and economic benefit through small business support. AAO dismissed, finding past experience does not establish prospective national importance of the specific endeavor and that industry importance alone does not meet Dhanasar standards.

Civil engineer and entrepreneur sought NIW for EB-2 to operate construction management company focused on sustainable projects. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance and petitioner not adequately well-positioned to advance it, despite working in important field.

A researcher with a master's in power engineering sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for endeavor developing sustainable integrated power systems. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor despite the proposed work having national importance; education alone does not establish positioning.

A mechanical engineering researcher seeking EB-2 classification and national interest waiver to develop new methodologies in vibrations engineering for aerospace and robotics applications. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the petitioner failed to establish he is well-positioned to advance the proposed research endeavor under Dhanasar's second prong.

A control systems engineer in the aerospace sector sought a national interest waiver, and the Director had found the first prong met. The AAO withdrew that finding because the proposed endeavor was not specifically defined, found him not well positioned, and dismissed the appeal without reaching the third prong.