Published AAO appeal decisions

A chemical engineer sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification because the record lacked evidence of requisite academic credentials and progressive employment experience, making the waiver issue moot.

A postdoctoral fellow in chemical engineering sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed fuel research. The AAO found the endeavor had merit and national importance but dismissed because the petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance it, particularly given limited citation impact and no demonstrated primary funding responsibility.

Adjunct chemistry instructor sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance but provided inconsistent information about proposed endeavor. AAO found significant unresolved questions and withdrew director's finding that first prong was met, dismissing appeal without reaching remaining prongs.

Industrial chemist seeking NIW for research on chemical applications. First prong met but second prong failed because patent and publications, though recognized, did not demonstrate sufficient industry impact or record of success needed to show petitioner well positioned to advance research endeavor.

Chemical engineer sought EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. Proposed continuation of work on solid waste and water quality treatment. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to qualify for underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification by meeting fewer than three regulatory criteria and failed first Dhanasar prong on national importance.

A materials scientist working for a manufacturer sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The director had denied on the third prong. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the first Dhanasar prong unmet because the proposed endeavor's national importance and job creation were not shown, and reserved the remaining prongs.

A chemical engineer sought an NIW under EB-2. The AAO dismissed the appeal because she failed to establish national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Her proposed endeavor—providing chemical engineering services across multiple industries—lacked specificity and demonstrated no substantial positive economic effects or potential to employ U.S. workers beyond individual employers.

A chemical engineer with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO found the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it, dismissing the appeal.

Materials chemistry researcher pursuing Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Met first Dhanasar prong: proposed research in smart polymers has broader field implications. Failed second prong: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance the research despite publications, citations, and support letters. Appeal dismissed.

Analytical chemist holding advanced degree sought national interest waiver for chemical sensor research. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner relied on past research but did not establish sufficient prospective impact or national importance for revised proposed endeavors involving new research directions.