Published AAO appeal decisions

A battery test engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 with employer sponsorship to develop lithium battery and soft electronics materials. The AAO found substantial merit but not national importance, as the proposed work's impact is confined to the employer and customers without broader field or economic advancement.

An inorganic chemist sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver for research in carbon-capturing metal-organic frameworks. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: the research has national importance for ecological sustainability, the petitioner is well positioned to advance it with her doctoral expertise and peer recognition, and waiving labor certification serves the national interest.

Research scientist in organic chemistry employed at FDA control laboratory sought national interest waiver. AAO sustained appeal: proposed research on reducing chemical waste in wastewater treatment satisfies all three Dhanasar prongs; environmental protection aligns with national security; petitioner well-positioned with doctoral degree and record.

Chemical engineer sought EB-2 classification and NIW waiver to consult for U.S. cosmetics companies on product formulation. AAO dismissed appeal, affirming Director's finding that proposed endeavor lacked national importance, despite petitioner arguing Director failed to discuss all evidence submitted.

Computational materials scientist sought NIW claiming work on quantum information science and functional materials. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to specify a concrete proposed endeavor as required under Dhanasar, despite notice and opportunity to clarify.

Chemical sales engineer and technical consultant seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit and national importance based on safety and water quality benefits. AAO affirmed denial, finding insufficient evidence that proposed work would have prospective national impact on field, welfare, or economy.