Published AAO appeal decisions

Colloid science researcher claimed extraordinary ability through peer review and published articles. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding peer review routine in the field and publications insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim or significant impact, failing to establish position among the very top.

An analytical chemist sought extraordinary ability classification in the sciences. Petitioner abandoned the membership criterion on appeal and did not meet awards, published material, or aggregate criteria. The AAO found the petitioner talented but not distinguished enough to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level. Petition denied.

A chemist filed a self-petition for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The director denied the petition for insufficient sustained acclaim evidence. The petitioner failed to address the director's specific findings or identify legal errors on appeal, so the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal without analyzing criteria.