Published AAO appeal decisions

Civil engineer with two master's degrees sought EB-2 national interest waiver for proposed construction consulting work. Qualifies as advanced degree holder but failed to establish national importance of endeavor. Petitioner showed only localized client benefits without broader field advancement or significant economic impact.

Project engineer sought NIW for EB-2. Service Center approved advanced degree but denied NIW. AAO dismissed because proposed roadway safety endeavor lacked sufficient detail and national importance; no direct connection established between specific endeavor and broader implications.

Civil engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for residential construction business venture. Director found petitioner qualified as advanced degree holder but waiver failed. AAO agreed petitioner did not establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong; construction work lacked broader field implications.

A civil engineer claimed extraordinary ability for EB-1A based on eight regulatory criteria. The AAO found he satisfied only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), below the three required, and failed the final merits test for sustained acclaim at the top of the field.

Architectural drafter sought EB-2 NIW classification. Proposed to work on healthcare facility design and eventually become senior designer. AAO dismissed, holding proposed work lacks national importance; confined to employer projects without demonstrating substantial positive economic effects or broader field impact.