Published AAO appeal decisions

A computer scientist filed successive motions to reopen and reconsider an EB-2 national interest waiver denial. The AAO dismissed the second motion, finding no new facts or legal errors; the petitioner confused prospective impact with past achievement and restated previously considered evidence without demonstrating that the proposed endeavor had national importance.

Postdoctoral researcher in wireless communications and networking seeking EB-2 NIW. SCOPS denied; first appeal found substantial merit and positioning but denied waiver on balancing prong. Motion to reconsider granted after AAO recognized Ph.D. in STEM field working on critical emerging technology as strong positive factor for national benefit under revised Dhanasar analysis.

A cybersecurity professional sought EB-2 NIW for work involving AI-powered threat detection and zero-trust architecture. The AAO found the proposed endeavor, though aligned with government priorities, lacks national importance because it would not demonstrate significant prospective impact on the industry or economy beyond the petitioner's prospective clients.

Mobile technology consultant appealed denial of EB-1A petition. Although petitioner claimed four criteria met, AAO found published material and leading role criteria not satisfied. Petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim and failed to establish extraordinary ability standard.