Published AAO appeal decisions

Graduate student in international law sought EB-2 NIW for online platform expanding African student pathways to U.S. education. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance; modest projected hiring and revenue insufficient for substantial economic impact.

A designer of mathematical education programs with EB-2 advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but petitioner failed to demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic benefits required for national importance.

High school mathematics teacher with fifteen years experience seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop hybrid and distance learning instructional framework. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to address USCIS findings on the third Dhanasar prong and waived the issue by failing to contest specific conclusions about impracticality of labor certification and national benefit.

Training and development specialist sought NIW for STEM education framework under Dhanasar. Advanced degree established. First prong failed: while endeavor had substantial merit, record lacked evidence of national importance and broad prospective impact. Framework described as scalable and replicable without detail or demonstrated innovation. Second and third prongs not reached.

Educational technology researcher claimed NIW for health literacy research advancing competency-based learning. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance despite university adoption at one institution, and applicant failed to show recent productivity or sustained research continuation warranting waiver.

Mathematics educator with 17 years teaching experience sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because impacts were limited to her company and students without demonstrating broader field-level benefits or innovation.

A petitioner with education background in emergency preparedness and school-based disaster response filed a motion to reopen and reconsider a dismissed national interest waiver appeal. The AAO dismissed the motion because the petitioner presented no new facts not previously submitted and failed to demonstrate the prior decision was based on incorrect law or policy.

Professional in employee training and development sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed nationwide capacity-building endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance and lacks specific scalable model or significant U.S. employment potential.

University sponsoring assistant professor in ethnomusicology for EB-2 exceptional ability with Schedule A designation. Petitioner claimed five of seven regulatory criteria. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to adequately develop arguments on appeal, rendering claims waived.

An English teacher and educational administrator from Turkey seeking EB-2 NIW classification failed to establish eligibility for the underlying advanced degree classification and did not demonstrate that her specific endeavor of integrating immigrants into the U.S. educational system had national importance, warranting dismissal.

Assistant professor of Arabic languages seeks waiver based on language instruction and curriculum development supporting military personnel readiness. Claimed endeavor involves research on cross-cultural communication and specialized translation. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has commendable ambitions but lacks documented prospective impact rising to national importance.

A musician and music educator sought EB-2 immigrant classification with national interest waiver. SCOPS established advanced degree eligibility but denied the waiver. The AAO remanded because SCOPS failed to sufficiently analyze the three Dhanasar prongs and did not put the petitioner on notice of evidentiary deficiencies.

Secondary school teacher seeking NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional to implement STEM program. Qualified for EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: program benefits constrained to participating schools and students; scalability and alignment with federal priorities insufficient for national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A petitioner sought EB-2 NIW classification for a Russian economics graduate. The AAO dismissed her combined motion to reopen and reconsider, holding the bachelor degree was completed in less than four years and the academic evaluation did not credibly establish foreign equivalency to a U.S. four-year degree.

Educator proposing nationwide framework for teacher quality and early childhood education, seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO held petitioner failed Dhanasar prong two: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance endeavor given limited experience and lack of stakeholder support from relevant officials.

STEM education platform developer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific online educational endeavor. Platform lacks broader field impact beyond prospective students; revenue projections and employment forecasts do not show substantial national economic effects.

Airline pilot and engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 to establish aviation safety training company in HUBZone. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; speculative training program lacks broad implications beyond proposed company clientele.

An urban and regional planning researcher sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance, as it did not demonstrate novel innovation or broader field-wide impact comparable to Dhanasar examples. The first NIW prong failed, and remaining prongs were not reached; the appeal was dismissed.

Special education coordinator sought EB-2 NIW to establish Texas education consultancy. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor, which lacked identifiable unique methodologies or prospective broad impact beyond local service provision.

A professional in international educational development with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2. AAO dismissed because while the field is important, the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her specific endeavor—placing visiting teachers in U.S. classrooms—which lacks broad implications beyond limited participants.

Education and public safety specialist seeks EB-2 NIW for proposed security services business and training company. Petitioner qualifies as advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of endeavor or evidence of success positioning her to advance it, thus ineligible for waiver.

An early childhood educator and behavioral counselor with master's degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for consulting business training educators in underserved communities. The AAO dismissed, holding that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; working in an important field, addressing labor shortages, or providing regional services does not establish prospective impact at a national level.

A robotics educator seeks EB-2 classification to develop a STEM education model teaching applied robotics to vulnerable youth. AAO held the petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability requirements, satisfying only two of ten criteria, and did not reach the national interest waiver analysis.

Self-petitioner teacher proposes English language instruction business in Florida targeting legal immigrant communities, claiming alignment with federal immigration priorities. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance; addressing important social issue insufficient; no evidence of broader field impact, substantial economic effects, or nationwide job creation.

An ESL teacher sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed a third motion to reconsider, finding the petitioner reargued previously rejected arguments without establishing error in law or policy. The underlying denial stood because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of his proposed endeavor.