AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
60 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO affirmed no advanced degree, found academic record but only one of six exceptional ability criteria met, insufficient for classification threshold. NIW analysis reserved as applicant ineligible for underlying EB-2 category.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
An entrepreneur owning pizza restaurant chains sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, affirming the director's denial; though the endeavor had substantial merit and job creation potential, it failed to demonstrate national importance as required under Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
A hospitality entrepreneur and bar professional sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming eight criteria. The Director accepted two, judging and leading role. The AAO agreed on those two but found the awards criterion unmet and deemed scholarly articles waived. It concluded that three criteria were not satisfied and that sustained acclaim was not shown.
2 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipMar 2023Dismissed
Retail entrepreneur seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Claimed three Dhanasar prongs but submitted only general professional plan without specific U.S. business establishment plans. AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated, failing first prong. Second and third prongs not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AEntrepreneurshipJan 2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur and business executive sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met only one of three required criteria (published material about him). AAO rejected awards, membership, judging, and leading role claims. No major recognized award. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet initial evidentiary threshold.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurship2023Dismissed
An entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with NIW for an environmentally friendly cleaning products company in Florida claimed nineteen years of experience and unique expertise. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; it would not impact the industry broadly or substantially employ U.S. workers.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurship2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur with master's degree in business administration seeking EB-2 national interest waiver to own and operate trucking company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit established but national importance not demonstrated; business impact limited to company clients without broader industry or economy-wide effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurship2023Dismissed
Self-employed entrepreneur proposing pet sitting, boarding, and dog walking services sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, benefiting only a narrow customer base rather than the nation broadly.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurship2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur in real estate services sought EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner did not demonstrate prospective impact beyond his company or significant potential to employ workers or provide substantial positive economic effects nationally.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurship2023Dismissed
An entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability or advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The Director denied him because he lacked an advanced degree, and the Dhanasar framework was not satisfied. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not dispute the Director's findings and the appeal waived all three prongs; the AAO declined to reach exceptional ability arguments.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
