Published AAO appeal decisions

An individual claiming advanced degree status as a physician sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found insufficient evidence of medical licensure in the United States and noted material inconsistencies in the proposed endeavor, changing from physician to epidemiologist between filing and responses, preventing clear Dhanasar analysis.

A cardiologist and director seeking NIW under EB-2 claimed substantial merit and national importance for clinical work, teaching, and leadership. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; clinical impact limited to individual workplace. Petitioner also failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance endeavor.

A dental surgeon with advanced degree sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. While qualified as advanced degree professional, the AAO agreed with the Director that the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under the first Dhanasar prong because the offered administrative position was unrelated to dental research and expansion plans lacked documented national economic impact.

A physician seeking EB-2 classification with NIW qualification proposed medical research combined with clinical practice. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong: the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance, with vague research intentions and minimal documentation insufficient to distinguish from ordinary practice.

Physical therapist entrepreneur qualified for advanced degree classification but sought national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked national importance; projected employment of 10-14 workers and local benefits insufficient; shortage in field does not establish national importance.

An anesthesiologist and professor claimed extraordinary ability under five EB-1A criteria. The AAO affirmed that she met judging and scholarly articles criteria but found she did not meet membership or original contributions criteria. With only two criteria met, the petitioner fell short of the required three, and the appeal was dismissed.

Senior research associate with advanced degree in medical data statistics sought NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed research had national importance but petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance it despite citations and peer review work.

A reconstructive surgeon sought NIW under EB-2 for proposed clinical and surgical practice. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because petitioner failed to demonstrate broader field impact or significant economic benefits beyond individual geographic areas.

Clinical research coordinator sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO dismissed because petitioner provided inconsistent descriptions of her proposed endeavor between initial and amended filings, preventing determination of whether the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance.

A physical therapist sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual, with a national interest waiver. The AAO held she met neither underlying classification because of insufficient qualifying experience and unchallenged findings on the regulatory criteria, so the waiver question was moot. The appeal was dismissed.

Medical scientist in dentistry with advanced degree sought NIW for dental services, clinical research, and clinic management. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance and detailed research plan, limiting impact to patients and students rather than the broader field.

An anesthesiologist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Although qualified as advanced degree professional, the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to address the Director's findings on two dispositive Dhanasar prongs: national importance and balancing analysis, leaving these conclusions uncontested.

Radiology clinic employer sponsored beneficiary with Ph.D. in biochemistry and M.D. in radiology. Claimed membership, original contributions, and scholarly articles criteria. AAO found only scholarly articles met; memberships insufficient and prior research predated medical training. Appeal dismissed as petitioner failed to establish three criteria required for extraordinary ability classification.

An academic medical center petitioned for a critical care physician beneficiary. The service center found initial criteria met but denied based on final merits. The AAO affirmed, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim despite publications and professional memberships, characterizing the beneficiary as diligent rather than exceptional.

Dermatologist established clinic offering skincare and aesthetic treatments, appeared on television and radio providing medical commentary. Claimed seven criteria; Director found only remuneration criterion met. AAO affirmed five criteria not satisfied and found record lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Self-petitioner oncologist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met two criteria: judging and scholarly articles. AAO dismissed appeal, finding original contributions criterion not satisfied and insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or top-tier recognition in medical field.

Endodontics professor sought EB-1A classification. Met three initial criteria via committee work, publications, and scholarly articles. AAO affirmed but rejected final merits, finding stale citation record, large editorial boards, and ad hoc local committee positions insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim. Appeal dismissed.

Nurse practitioner sought NIW for EB-2. Petitioner claimed national importance based on occupation's overall value and COVID-19 pandemic, plus conference attendance and multilingual background. AAO dismissed, finding benefit to individual patients and local conference attendance insufficient to establish national importance; endeavor must have broader implications beyond current employment.

Chinese dentist and research center director sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met judging and scholarly article criteria but AAO found only two of three required criteria established. Final merits analysis concluded petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim and is not among small percentage at top of dental field.

Dentist and entrepreneur seeks NIW for dental implantology research and treatment. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it benefits only the petitioner's patients and employer without broader implications for U.S. workforce or economy, thus denying NIW eligibility.

A geriatric nurse with an advanced degree sought national interest waiver of labor certification. She qualified for EB-2 advanced degree status but failed to establish national importance: her patient care, manuals, and lectures lacked documentary evidence of broader impact beyond her individual patients and facility.

Physical therapist with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for a proposed Florida clinic offering physical therapy and fall prevention services. The AAO found the endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar; local employment projections and unquantified cost savings insufficient to demonstrate broader implications.

A neurological surgeon claimed seven criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that she met judging and scholarly articles but rejected awards and membership, and determined that meeting only two criteria did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the top tier.

A dentist/manager sought EB-2 national interest waiver to open a dental practice and mobile services in Florida. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that while the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional, the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; serving specific patients and markets did not demonstrate broader field or economic impact.

Maternal and child health specialist and school principal met two criteria: published material and judging. Did not establish leading role for distinguished organization. Director and AAO found only two criteria met, below three required. Lacks sustained national or international acclaim. Appeal dismissed.