AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
6 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1ALife sciences and medicineJun 2026Remanded
Biophysics researcher appealed USCIS EB-1A denial. USCIS found fewer than three criteria met. AAO held researcher met three initial criteria; USCIS underweighted original contributions evidence. Decision remanded for final merits determination on sustained acclaim at field's top.
3 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineMay 2026Remanded
A scientist seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver to conduct immunology research targeting autoimmune diseases and cancer. Service center denied the waiver based on inadequate national importance. AAO remanded because service center failed to properly analyze the proposed endeavor's specifics, the petitioner's qualifications, and factors favoring waiver.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicineFeb 2026Remanded
Assistant professor and neurodegenerative disease researcher with fifteen years experience claiming extraordinary ability. Service center determination lacked reasoned explanation and contained factual inaccuracies regarding her qualifications and publication record. AAO remanded for service center to conduct full, properly reasoned review of all claimed criteria.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2025Remanded
A biochemist with a Ph.D. in Korean integrative medicine seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor met the first Dhanasar prong but remanded because SCOPS inadequately analyzed the petitioner's h-index, citations, publications, and recommendations for the second prong.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicineAug 2023Remanded
Medical researcher of rare diseases self-petitioned as EB-1A. Service center found only two of ten criteria met. AAO found original contributions of major significance criterion satisfied, withdrawing service center's contrary finding. However, because service center made no final merits determination on sustained acclaim, AAO remanded for full analysis of whether petitioner rises to very top of field.
1 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicineNov 2022Remanded
Senior life science product consultant claimed extraordinary ability through six criteria. Director found two met. AAO found three criteria satisfied and withdrew denial, requiring final merits review to assess sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
3 of 7 criteria metRead →
