Published AAO appeal decisions

Commercial airline pilot sought EB-2 NIW for pilot services. AAO held petitioner lacks exceptional ability under underlying EB-2 classification and did not establish endeavor national importance. Appeal dismissed.

Airline pilot sought EB-2 classification with NIW. AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under EB-2 standards; threshold EB-2 eligibility was not met, making NIW analysis unnecessary.

Automotive repair mechanic and operations manager seeking EB-2 exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed dismissal because evidence does not show exceptional ability—expertise significantly above ordinary in field. Threshold EB-2 qualification not met; Dhanasar analysis not reached.

Individual claiming exceptional ability in sciences, arts or business seeks EB-2 NIW. Did not establish underlying EB-2 classification eligibility. AAO dismissed appeal without reaching NIW framework because petitioner failed foundational requirement of demonstrating advanced degree or exceptional ability status.

Employer-sponsored airfield operations specialist sought EB-2 NIW. Underlying EB-2 eligibility not determined by director. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed airport operations work lacks national importance; benefits limited to single employer without broader aviation field impact.

A truck driver and business owner in road transport and logistics sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. The AAO held his proposed occupation does not qualify as a profession requiring an advanced degree under EB-2 standards, rendering him ineligible for the waiver.

A pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that he did not meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability, failing to establish EB-2 eligibility. Dhanasar framework analysis was not required; appeal dismissed.

A commercial aircraft pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. Although he met three evidentiary criteria by plain language, the final merits determination found he lacked expertise significantly above ordinary in his field. The AAO affirmed dismissal without reaching the waiver framework.

An eyeglass manufacturer petitioned for a quality control inspector, seeking EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, plus a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because none of the exceptional ability criteria or the advanced degree requirement was shown, so the waiver analysis was not reached.

A commercial pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found he met fewer than three exceptional ability criteria, since a pilot association membership was not shown to be a professional association. It reserved the waiver question, so this is not a Dhanasar merits decision.

Construction tradesman sought NIW for occupational health and safety consulting. AAO dismissed appeal because repeated material misrepresentations about the proposed endeavor vitiated eligibility, and even setting those aside, the endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance it.

A self-petitioner researcher in geospatial information management sought an NIW as an advanced degree professional. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she demonstrated substantial merit and was well-positioned but failed to establish the national importance of her proposed research as required by Dhanasar's first prong.

A pilot sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to meet evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability or advanced degree professional status, lacking sufficient documentation from employers and relevant credentials, and therefore was ineligible for the underlying classification and waiver.

A pilot seeking EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW failed to submit required labor certification and did not clearly specify whether seeking classification as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not establish EB-2 eligibility or merit for NIW under Dhanasar framework.

Pilot sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found advanced degree equivalent established but rejected NIW claim. Proposed endeavor of airline piloting lacks demonstrable national importance beyond industry-wide pilot shortage. Letters and advisory opinion failed to explain specific endeavor impact. Appeal dismissed.

Industrial technician seeks exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO found petitioner did not meet initial evidentiary requirements for EB-2 exceptional ability, particularly lacking education or experience in proposed CEO role. Did not reach NIW merits.

A commercial pilot seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. AAO held that pilot's evidence—flight school completion, licensing, and employer letters—did not demonstrate exceptional ability as regulatory standard requires; salary evidence post-dated filing and lacked context.

Helicopter pilot sought NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. AAO held pilot failed to meet the underlying exceptional ability requirement by not satisfying the evidentiary criteria sufficiently in totality, and therefore did not reach NIW merits determination.

A pilot seeks EB-2 national interest waiver claiming his work would address aviation industry pilot shortage. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to clearly define his specific proposed endeavor and lacked sufficient evidence of substantial merit and national importance.

Pilot with advanced degree equivalent seeks NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no demonstrated national importance for proposed pilot work. Working in important field and having professional qualifications insufficient; decision requires evidence of specific endeavor's impact on field as whole.

A pilot sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for aviation work. AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor as required by the first Dhanasar prong; general industry importance insufficient.

Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under EB-2 and that proposed endeavor lacks substantial merit and national importance, failing the first Dhanasar prong. Second and third prongs not addressed.

Commercial captain sought NIW under EB-2 as advanced degree professional. Claimed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance addressing pilot shortage. AAO found record did not establish national importance of specific proposed work as individual pilot, lacking evidence of broader industry impact or individual contribution to resolving shortage.

Aircraft mechanic self-petitioner claimed exceptional ability under EB-2 and sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because petitioner failed to establish by preponderance of evidence that expertise was significantly above ordinary in field, and thus did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification required for NIW eligibility.

A petitioner claiming exceptional ability for security management proposed a waiver. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the EB-2 exceptional ability classification (not meeting three of six regulatory criteria) and provided inconsistent, insufficient evidence regarding the specific proposed endeavor required for national interest waiver analysis.