Published AAO appeal decisions

Self-petitioner film director and producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found only one of six required criteria met. Evidence of awards, original contributions, exhibitions, and critical roles was insufficient or unsupported. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

Human resources specialist seeking EB-2 NIW classification claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only two of six exceptional ability criteria: insufficient full-time experience documentation as HR specialist and inadequate evidence of achievement. Because three criteria are required, NIW Dhanasar framework analysis not reached.

Financial analyst sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite meeting some regulatory criteria. Work benefited only individual employers, not the field broadly or the nation.

Operational risk manager and consultant seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Claimed national importance through preventing financial losses and white-collar crime prevention. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance or broader implications beyond client work; insufficient evidence of field-wide impact.

Physical therapist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner materially changed her endeavor between initial filing and RFE response, and field shortage does not establish national importance under Dhanasar framework.

Physical therapist sought NIW for EB-2 classification to operate her own clinic. AAO affirmed denial, finding her specific endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because benefits would extend only to her individual patients, not the field or nation broadly, and thus did not warrant labor certification waiver.

An artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed four criteria and the Director found two met. On appeal, the AAO determined that even the two met criteria were insufficient and that the remaining claimed criteria were not established. The petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

A business manager seeking EB-2 NIW classification proposed a startup consulting company planning to employ thirty workers at modest wages. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the local startup lacked national importance or global implications within any field despite prior work achievements.

Supply chain manager sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner lacks advanced degree and failed to show national importance of proposed endeavor in cell tower maintenance industry, focusing on field importance rather than specific endeavor impact.

Credit analyst seeks NIW for EB-2 to establish mortgage lending company in Florida. AAO affirmed denial because proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Regional focus and projected employment of 21 workers insufficient to demonstrate broad impact on industry.

Physician and entrepreneur seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Claimed national importance based on employment creation and economic benefits of medical clinics. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance; appeal arguments did not overcome Director's finding of insufficient evidence.

Fire prevention specialist claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Petitioner satisfied three criteria: membership, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO held final merits prong failed: although respected locally and in capital city, petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required; articles had limited impact; patents unproven in commercial production or significance.

A nurse seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed critical care nursing and later a healthcare business would have national importance. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the endeavor lacked national importance; industry importance and employment experience do not establish prospective impact beyond immediate scope required.

A business operations specialist sought NIW EB-2 classification proposing a revenue management consulting company for tourism sector small businesses. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; statistics about industry size do not establish broader field impact.

A Nepali journalist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification based on nine criteria claims. The AAO found she did not satisfy the three-criterion threshold, finding no national or international recognition for her award, membership, published material, original contributions, or salary. Two additional criteria were claimed but not analyzed as the threshold failed.

Martial arts athlete appealed EB-1A denial. AAO affirmed that petitioner failed to meet three of ten regulatory criteria required as initial evidence, finding neither a major internationally recognized award nor sufficient qualifying alternate criteria established.

Tour guide and entrepreneur sought NIW under EB-2 for tourism business venture in Arizona. Petitioner claimed job creation and economic benefits would demonstrate national importance. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance; general industry growth statistics insufficient; petitioner not well positioned as entrepreneur; balancing prong not reached.

A career development mentor and training consultant in beauty services sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed because her consulting company for beauty salons lacked national importance: it would not impact the industry broadly, and projections of modest revenue and two employees did not establish substantial economic effects nationally.

Aircraft mechanic sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under three of six regulatory criteria, including insufficient experience, salary not demonstrating exceptional ability, and membership in professional association not meeting regulatory requirements. Appeal dismissed; Dhanasar framework not reached.

Entrepreneur seeks EB-2 NIW to establish educational and research institute in social sciences and contemporary history. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; no evidence of significant U.S. employment potential or substantial positive economic effects commensurate with national importance.

Accountant sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO found MBA from Brazil not established as U.S. equivalent advanced degree, and experience letters lacked required detail. Petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability criteria. Appeal dismissed because petitioner ineligible for underlying EB-2 classification.

Physician specializing in oncologic breast surgery sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked the national importance required under Dhanasar first prong because petitioner failed to demonstrate broader implications or substantial prospective impact beyond individual medical practice.

A cybersecurity analyst with MBA sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but found no national importance: it would impact only individual clients and customers without demonstrating broader industry implications or implementation strategy. Appeal dismissed.

An IT consultant with an advanced degree sought EB-2 and NIW. The Director approved the underlying advanced degree classification but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner's proposed IT consulting business lacked evidence of national importance under the first Dhanasar prong.