Published AAO appeal decisions

A medical doctor practicing medical malpractice litigation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied only one of ten criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required to demonstrate extraordinary ability.

Taekwondo instructor and exercise physiologist sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner did not demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor; evidence showed no substantial positive economic effects or significant potential to employ U.S. workers. Appeal dismissed.

Environmental compliance inspector with advanced degree sought NIW for environmental consulting company. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance, existing only for potential client impact. Appeal dismissed.

Business administrator with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO held petitioner failed to identify specific proposed endeavor consistently, providing conflicting information on appeal. Cannot establish merit or national importance. Appeal dismissed.

Manufacturing technician seeking EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. AAO affirmed director's finding petitioner failed to establish advanced degree or meet three of six exceptional ability criteria; lacked sufficient experience documentation. NIW analysis not reached. Appeal dismissed.

An insurance sales manager sought NIW for EB-2 to operate an insurance consulting company. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the specific endeavor lacked national importance despite industry significance; projected employment and profits insufficient to demonstrate substantial economic effects at national level.

A general and operations manager self-petitioned for EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because the evidence of ten years of full-time experience in that occupation did not match the claimed duties, and no other criteria beyond the academic record were met. The waiver analysis was reserved.

An architect sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO found she failed the first Dhanasar prong because her proposed endeavor combining healthcare facility design and hurricane-resistant solutions lacked clarity and sufficient national importance beyond serving individual clients.

Lawyer seeks EB-2 NIW to create and operate consulting company focusing on Uzbekistan and Central Asia trade and investment. AAO held proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; recommendation letters contain vague assertions without specific evidence of U.S. economic impact or job creation.

Real estate developer sought NIW under EB-2. Petitioner claimed his development endeavor has national importance and substantial merit. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because petitioner failed to demonstrate its projected employment or economic benefits distinguish it from ordinary industry work or have substantial prospective national impact.

A doctoral student in business research sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found the proposed organizational behavior research endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the applicant lacked sufficient education, publication record, and demonstrated success to show he was well-positioned to advance it. Appeal dismissed.

A truck driver and business owner in road transport and logistics sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. The AAO held his proposed occupation does not qualify as a profession requiring an advanced degree under EB-2 standards, rendering him ineligible for the waiver.

A speech-language pathologist with a master's degree sought EB-2 NIW, proposing research in speech pathology. The AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the petitioner failed to establish she was well-positioned to advance it; her publications lacked citations, letters came largely from associates, and evidence did not demonstrate sufficient research success or industry interest.

Entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal finding petitioner met only two of required three criteria: academic record and membership. Petitioner failed to demonstrate license criterion applied and recognition for achievements; Dhanasar analysis not reached.

Airport operations specialist sought EB-2 NIW classification. Service center found him ineligible for advanced degree category due to less than three years post-degree work experience. AAO upheld denial and held petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability criteria and Dhanasar's first prong, lacking sufficient evidence of expertise, employment history, and national importance of proposed endeavor.

Marketing manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business focused on navigating Brazilian regulatory and financial matters claimed national importance through industry expertise and job creation. AAO held specific endeavor lacks national importance because applicant provided no documentation of prospective impact on field, business plan projections insufficient to demonstrate national economic significance.

A business administrator seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed national importance based on past professional achievements and a self-developed "Triad of Value" method. The AAO found the petitioner misunderstood Dhanasar: the first prong focuses on the proposed endeavor's prospective impact, not the petitioner's execution or prior success.

An agricultural sales representative seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for sales employment. AAO affirmed that proposed activities lack national importance despite projected job creation and increased agricultural product exports, because record failed to establish national significance or industry advancement.

Sewing professional claimed exceptional ability under six EB-2 criteria. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she met only one criterion reliably. Because underlying EB-2 classification was not established, the national interest waiver claim was not addressed.

Security consultant and former Brazilian military police officer sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. AAO found he failed to meet three evidentiary criteria: lacked proper professional license, salary not indicative of exceptional ability, and membership organization unsubstantiated. Dhanasar analysis not reached.

Business analyst with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 to start financial consulting startup. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks national importance due to inconsistent business descriptions, unresolved evidentiary gaps, and lack of industry documentation. Appeal dismissed.

A pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that he did not meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability, failing to establish EB-2 eligibility. Dhanasar framework analysis was not required; appeal dismissed.

Hotel and tourism industry manager sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to establish EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability. NIW analysis not reached due to lack of underlying qualification.

An entrepreneur planning a trucking business sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he met fewer than three initial criteria, due to insufficient evidence of experience, licensure, salary and membership. The waiver itself was not decided, so this is not a Dhanasar decision.

A commercial aircraft pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. Although he met three evidentiary criteria by plain language, the final merits determination found he lacked expertise significantly above ordinary in his field. The AAO affirmed dismissal without reaching the waiver framework.