Published AAO appeal decisions

Application manager seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed IT work providing services to organizations with important missions. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while petitioner was highly qualified and IT field important, no evidence showed specific proposed endeavor would impact IT field broadly or create substantial economic or employment benefits nationally.

Physical therapist and doula with advanced degree seeking national interest waiver for EB-2. Petitioner claimed endeavor has national importance due to therapist shortage and Brazilian healthcare knowledge. AAO found petitioner submitted industry-level data but failed to demonstrate her specific endeavor would have national importance; individual patient care and business startup lack evidence of broader field impact.

Motion on P-1 nonimmigrant visa petition for boxer. Petitioner sought to reopen appeal of Service Center denial. AAO dismissed motion to reopen and motion to reconsider as lacking new facts addressing distinguished competition and international reputation requirements.

A freight transportation entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because the AAO withdrew the service center's findings on degree, license and membership criteria, since the degree was unrelated and the license and membership post-dated filing. The waiver framework was left unaddressed.

A cleaning-products manufacturer petitioned for its president, seeking an advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The service center found the degree qualification met but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that national importance of the endeavor was not shown through employment or economic effects, and reserved the other prongs.

A sports coordinator and trainer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver under Dhanasar. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance, despite addressing the important issue of childhood obesity. The petitioner failed to show the work would impact U.S. soccer or public health broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects.

A database engineer with MBA sought NIW for freelance work and founding an online IT school. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance the online school despite having relevant experience and business background.

Transportation engineer with bachelor's degree and work experience sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO found he lacked sufficient post-baccalaureate experience for advanced degree classification and his proposed traffic engineering endeavor lacked the national importance required for waiver under Dhanasar.

Former customs official sought NIW for EB-2 classification to establish customs consulting firm and clearance services in United States. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance beyond petitioner's clientele, petitioner lacks entrepreneurial experience despite customs expertise, and therefore waiver not warranted.

A journalism professor proposing an open-access radio content institute for training and broadcasting. AAO held that while substantial merit was established, national importance was not; evidence lacked demonstrable prospective impact on field or broader implications commensurate with national significance.

Professional freestyle wrestler seeks NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Proposed competing and coaching for university wrestling club to increase U.S. athletic competitiveness. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite substantial merit; evidence showed petitioner's skills and value but no documentation of prospective impact on sport broadly or significant employment or economic benefits.

A solution director in supply chain and manufacturing technology sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming four criteria. The Director accepted two. The AAO found only judging satisfied, rejected original contributions and leading role, treated scholarly articles as waived, and dismissed because acclaim was confined to employers and collaborators.

Dentist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner did not establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional (lacked DDS/DMD equivalent) or exceptional ability (only met two of six criteria). AAO dismissed appeal.

Nurse petitioner self-filed for EB-2 with NIW, proposing to provide expert nursing advice and treatment at a healthcare facility. AAO dismissed: the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it benefits only the specific employer and patients, not the broader field, and general industry reports about nursing shortages do not address the specific endeavor's national impact.

A sailing instructor sought extraordinary ability classification, with the director finding neither a major internationally recognized award nor three evidentiary criteria shown. On appeal the petitioner submitted letters but identified no error of law or fact in the denial, so the appeal was summarily dismissed without examining the underlying evidence.

An entrepreneur and researcher in cybersecurity on O-1 visa sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding he satisfied only two of ten criteria and thus failed the initial threshold, with aggregate review showing insufficient acclaim and recognition required for the classification.

Medical researcher in liver transplantation sought EB-2 NIW. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO found proposed research had national importance but petitioner was not well positioned to advance it—lacking sufficient publication record, citations, and field recognition to demonstrate success trajectory.

Researcher in biology seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner met only two of ten evidentiary criteria (judging, scholarly articles) but the decision rejects original contributions criterion; does not qualify as individual of extraordinary ability.

A commercial pilot sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver of the job offer. The AAO withdrew the director's findings on the academic record, experience and membership criteria, leaving too few criteria met. It dismissed the appeal and reserved the waiver question without applying the Dhanasar framework.

A radiologist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification met the threshold evidentiary criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found that while the petitioner demonstrated substantial accomplishments and institutional affiliations, the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of nuclear medicine.

A nurse sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her proposed nursing services endeavor. The decision held that providing nursing services lacks the broader field implications and substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar.

A Venezuelan OB/GYN physician claimed extraordinary ability through eight criteria. The AAO found two criteria met: judging and scholarly articles. However, these routine academic activities lack the acclaim requirement, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international recognition or widespread field impact.

A talent agency petitioned for O-1A classification for a stand-up comedian. The petitioner claimed lead performer status, national recognition, and commercial success. The AAO found the petitioner satisfied fewer than three required evidentiary criteria and dismissed the appeal without reaching the overall sustained acclaim analysis.

A police sheriff sought national interest waiver for law enforcement or corporate security consulting work. The AAO found the petitioner does not qualify as advanced degree professional and failed to demonstrate her proposed endeavor has national importance beyond specific employers or school programs.