AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
655 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsAug 2026Dismissed
Senior data scientist with Ph.D. in mechanical engineering sought EB-2 national interest waiver for healthcare data science innovation work. USCIS and AAO agreed the proposed endeavor, though having substantial merit, lacked requisite national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Benefits appeared confined to specific employer rather than field broadly. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2026Dismissed
Microbiologist self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found first prong met and withdrew SCOPS adverse finding, but dismissed on second prong, holding PhD and citation numbers alone insufficient to show she is well-positioned to advance the proposed microbiological research endeavor.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2026Dismissed
Nurse proposing clinical safety audit implementation claims national interest waiver. AAO agreed proposal has substantial merit but found no national importance: letters lacked specific evidence that the endeavor offers broader healthcare field implications or substantial positive national economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AComputer science and AIAug 2026Dismissed
Information technology service delivery manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Appeal dismissed. Petitioner had invalid signature on Form I-290B. Substantively, although petitioner met two initial criteria, evidence demonstrated only local or organizational recognition, not the sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementAug 2026Dismissed
Entrepreneur in mergers and acquisitions and financial services sought EB-1A classification. Claimed seven criteria. AAO found awards and leading role criteria were not met because supporting evidence lacked adequate recognition and organization stature alone does not establish award prestige. Salary criterion failed for lack of comparative data. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureAug 2026Dismissed
Classical music composer seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met three initial criteria but failed final merits step. AAO held beneficiary did not sufficiently contextualize or compare accomplishments to other renowned composers to show sustained acclaim and elite status.
3 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFinance and economicsAug 2026Dismissed
Risk analyst and doctoral student in business administration claimed EB-1A classification with three criteria met: published material, judging, and scholarly articles. AAO found criteria satisfied but dismissed on final merits, concluding limited media coverage and recent peer review activity insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim at top of field.
3 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringAug 2026Dismissed
A researcher in earthquake science and seismic monitoring sought a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement under the Dhanasar framework. The AAO accepted substantial merit but held the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance, since broader field benefits and federal priorities did not show his own work's impact. It dismissed the appeal.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AChemistry and materialsAug 2026Dismissed
Materials scientist with doctorate claimed four criteria and satisfied three: judging, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO dismissed appeal, finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement in the small percentage at the field's top.
3 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2026Dismissed
Ecologist with PhD seeking EB-2 NIW for climate change research on carbon cycling and greenhouse gas emissions. Claimed endeavor has national importance through field relevance and expert letters. AAO held proposed specific endeavor lacks national importance; evidence addresses field importance rather than prospective impact of particular work.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AComputer science and AIAug 2026Dismissed
Artificial intelligence graduate researcher failed to meet three-criterion threshold. AAO found competition awards not nationally recognized; ChatGPT-sourced supporting documents deemed unreliable. With only two criteria potentially met, final merits analysis reserved as unnecessary.
0 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsAug 2026Dismissed
Multimedia host and creative producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six evidentiary criteria. AAO affirmed USCIS finding that petitioner met only two criteria (published material and critical role), failing three-criterion threshold. No evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at field's top level.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFinance and economicsAug 2026Dismissed
Financial specialist in investment banking in China sought extraordinary ability in financial technology and cross-border investment. AAO upheld dismissal because petitioner failed to demonstrate three of ten required criteria; awards lacked recognition and original contributions were not shown to be major or industry-adopted.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsAug 2026Dismissed
A competitive swimmer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO held he failed to meet the evidentiary threshold, finding only two criteria satisfied and rejecting published material and leading role claims. Final merits also not demonstrated despite claimed accomplishments.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2026Dismissed
Graduate student in international law sought EB-2 NIW for online platform expanding African student pathways to U.S. education. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance; modest projected hiring and revenue insufficient for substantial economic impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementAug 2026Dismissed
Leadership and personal development consultant sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found published material criterion met but judging and leading role criteria failed; overall evidence lacked sustained acclaim or elite positioning. Decision noted willful misrepresentation of material facts. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateAug 2026Dismissed
A postdoctoral researcher in geological sciences with Ph.D. sought NIW for AI-enabled subsurface prediction framework for carbon capture. AAO dismissed because the applicant failed to demonstrate the specific proposed endeavor has national importance; general field importance and employer benefits insufficient without showing broader prospective impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFinance and economicsAug 2026Dismissed
An investment banker claimed extraordinary ability in his field. He met four regulatory criteria but failed on high salary and overall final merits. The AAO upheld dismissal, finding he is on a trajectory to reach the top but is currently a mid-career associate without demonstrated seniority, major deal leadership, or industry-wide reputation required for extraordinary ability.
4 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AComputer science and AIAug 2026Dismissed
Dismissed · 6 criteria reviewed0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2026Dismissed
CEO and entrepreneur in healthcare facility maintenance and waste management seeks to establish cleaning services business in Florida. Claimed endeavor would strengthen healthcare institutions and create jobs. AAO dismissed appeal; AAO also withdrew USCIS determination that petitioner qualifies as advanced degree professional, and found endeavor lacks national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalAug 2026Dismissed
A palliative and home care nurse sought EB-1A classification but submitted a fraudulent academic article published in a fake journal. The AAO found willful material misrepresentation, withdrew findings on one criterion, and concluded the petitioner failed to meet the three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWCivil and environmental engineeringAug 2026Dismissed
Strategic initiatives manager with advanced degrees in MBA and civil engineering seeks NIW to bridge structural engineering and sustainable infrastructure technology. AAO dismissed finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite working in STEM field.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineAug 2026Dismissed
Physician researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver for endeavor in medical research. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but petitioner not well-positioned to advance it. Record showed primarily literature review work without demonstrated original primary research or significant field influence. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsAug 2026Dismissed
Advanced degree professional in Islamic banking and finance seeking national interest waiver. Proposed ethical-finance toolkit for multistate adoption. USCIS and AAO found endeavor meritorious but lacked corroborating evidence of substantial economic effects, field-broad impact, or national importance required under Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2026Dismissed
Training and development specialist sought EB-2 NIW for workforce training endeavor. USCIS found substantial merit but denied, concluding proposed endeavor lacked national importance. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate specific endeavor would have broader implications or substantial prospective impact beyond personal business.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
