AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
854 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
Change management specialist in human resources seeking EB-2 with NIW to establish consultancy serving small and medium businesses on diversity and inclusion. Demonstrated strong professional record. AAO affirmed denial: lone consultancy business lacks national importance; individual accomplishments relate to personal qualifications, not endeavor impact required by Dhanasar.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2023Dismissed
Physical therapist with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO found the proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance and applicant failed to show she is well-positioned to advance it. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
A general manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The Director found she did not establish exceptional ability eligibility. The petitioner did not contest this determination on appeal and did not address the waiver framework, so the appeal was dismissed based on waived underlying eligibility issues.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipAug 2023Dismissed
Automotive bodywork technician sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability despite meeting three of six criteria. Final merits determination required showing expertise significantly above ordinary level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2023Dismissed
Church and homeschool teacher sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner qualified as advanced degree holder but failed to establish national importance of teaching endeavor, which only benefits individual students, not broader education system.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsAug 2023Dismissed
Self-petitioner film director and producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found only one of six required criteria met. Evidence of awards, original contributions, exhibitions, and critical roles was insufficient or unsupported. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
Human resources specialist seeking EB-2 NIW classification claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met only two of six exceptional ability criteria: insufficient full-time experience documentation as HR specialist and inadequate evidence of achievement. Because three criteria are required, NIW Dhanasar framework analysis not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsAug 2023Dismissed
Financial analyst sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite meeting some regulatory criteria. Work benefited only individual employers, not the field broadly or the nation.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
Operational risk manager and consultant seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Claimed national importance through preventing financial losses and white-collar crime prevention. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance or broader implications beyond client work; insufficient evidence of field-wide impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2023Dismissed
Physical therapist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner materially changed her endeavor between initial filing and RFE response, and field shortage does not establish national importance under Dhanasar framework.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2023Dismissed
Physical therapist sought NIW for EB-2 classification to operate her own clinic. AAO affirmed denial, finding her specific endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because benefits would extend only to her individual patients, not the field or nation broadly, and thus did not warrant labor certification waiver.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureAug 2023Dismissed
An artist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed four criteria and the Director found two met. On appeal, the AAO determined that even the two met criteria were insufficient and that the remaining claimed criteria were not established. The petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
A business manager seeking EB-2 NIW classification proposed a startup consulting company planning to employ thirty workers at modest wages. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the local startup lacked national importance or global implications within any field despite prior work achievements.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
Supply chain manager sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner lacks advanced degree and failed to show national importance of proposed endeavor in cell tower maintenance industry, focusing on field importance rather than specific endeavor impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsAug 2023Dismissed
Credit analyst seeks NIW for EB-2 to establish mortgage lending company in Florida. AAO affirmed denial because proposed endeavor lacked national importance. Regional focus and projected employment of 21 workers insufficient to demonstrate broad impact on industry.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2023Dismissed
Physician and entrepreneur seeking NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. Claimed national importance based on employment creation and economic benefits of medical clinics. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance; appeal arguments did not overcome Director's finding of insufficient evidence.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AOtherAug 2023Dismissed
Fire prevention specialist claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Petitioner satisfied three criteria: membership, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO held final merits prong failed: although respected locally and in capital city, petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required; articles had limited impact; patents unproven in commercial production or significance.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalAug 2023Dismissed
A nurse seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed critical care nursing and later a healthcare business would have national importance. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the endeavor lacked national importance; industry importance and employment experience do not establish prospective impact beyond immediate scope required.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
A business operations specialist sought NIW EB-2 classification proposing a revenue management consulting company for tourism sector small businesses. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; statistics about industry size do not establish broader field impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AMarketing, media, communicationsAug 2023Dismissed
A Nepali journalist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification based on nine criteria claims. The AAO found she did not satisfy the three-criterion threshold, finding no national or international recognition for her award, membership, published material, original contributions, or salary. Two additional criteria were claimed but not analyzed as the threshold failed.
0 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsAug 2023Dismissed
Martial arts athlete appealed EB-1A denial. AAO affirmed that petitioner failed to meet three of ten regulatory criteria required as initial evidence, finding neither a major internationally recognized award nor sufficient qualifying alternate criteria established.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
Tour guide and entrepreneur sought NIW under EB-2 for tourism business venture in Arizona. Petitioner claimed job creation and economic benefits would demonstrate national importance. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance; general industry growth statistics insufficient; petitioner not well positioned as entrepreneur; balancing prong not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementAug 2023Dismissed
A career development mentor and training consultant in beauty services sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed because her consulting company for beauty salons lacked national importance: it would not impact the industry broadly, and projections of modest revenue and two employees did not establish substantial economic effects nationally.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherAug 2023Dismissed
Aircraft mechanic sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability under three of six regulatory criteria, including insufficient experience, salary not demonstrating exceptional ability, and membership in professional association not meeting regulatory requirements. Appeal dismissed; Dhanasar framework not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaAug 2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur seeks EB-2 NIW to establish educational and research institute in social sciences and contemporary history. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; no evidence of significant U.S. employment potential or substantial positive economic effects commensurate with national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
