Published AAO appeal decisions

A political science professor and researcher with a master's and PhD sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. She claimed nine regulatory criteria. The AAO found the awards and membership criteria unmet and did not reach the remaining criteria or final merits because initial evidence threshold was not satisfied.

A data analyst and signal processing engineer with a master's degree sought an EB-2 NIW based on work with digital systems. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the national importance of his specific endeavor and that he was well-positioned to advance it, lacking sufficient employer and objective source documentation.

A Middle East analyst sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the petitioner met three initial criteria (judging, scholarly articles, critical roles) but dismissed the appeal, concluding the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim placing him among the field's very top.

A specialist in digital transformation and cybersecurity seeks EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. Service center found substantial merit and that petitioner was well-positioned to advance the endeavor but rejected it for lack of national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the specific proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite field importance.

Bioengineer in precision medicine and drug discovery met first Dhanasar prong with substantial merit and national importance. However, lacked PhD and did not demonstrate sufficient progress, plan, or stakeholder interest required for second prong. Appeal dismissed.

A designer of mathematical education programs with EB-2 advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but petitioner failed to demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic benefits required for national importance.

A computer science engineer in management positions sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria, and declined to reach the final merits determination.

Tattoo artist self-petitioner met three regulatory criteria but failed to achieve extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met published material, judging, and exhibition criteria but dismissed appeal because overall record did not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field.

Composer, music minister, and ethnomusicology educator claimed six criteria. AAO affirmed judging and scholarly articles but rejected published material on plain language grounds. Petitioner waived remaining claims. Falls short of sustained national or international acclaim threshold.

A senior manager of pavements with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for sustainable pavement engineering research. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance the research through education, skills, and record of success.

A mechanical engineer and project manager with an advanced degree proposed continuing infrastructure work in energy and oil-gas sectors. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because his work would not extend beyond clients with broader implications, and he made impermissible material changes to his endeavor.

Petitioner is a cybersecurity professional proposing to advance Internet of Things security in critical infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal finding substantial merit but lacking national importance; petitioner's skills and client-focused work do not demonstrate broader implications rising to national importance level required.

Applicant with political science and public administration degree seeking NIW for supply chain management in oil and gas. AAO dismissed appeal on two independent grounds: educational training not tied to proposed endeavor and advanced degree requirement not established; additionally, Form I-290B and Form G-28 lacked valid original signatures.

Advanced degree professional proposed financial workflow optimization for small and medium enterprises. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacked national importance; evidence of industry importance insufficient to establish specific endeavor's national significance under Dhanasar framework.

Entrepreneur in agricultural technology with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for platform-based operational model. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor lacks national importance because petitioner did not demonstrate impact beyond business and future clients to the field more broadly.

Medical nutrition executive appealed EB-1A denial. AAO found she satisfied three initial evidentiary criteria including high salary, published material, and original contributions. However, appeal dismissed because petitioner failed final merits determination; evidence insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim placing her among the small percentage at the field's very top.

Systems development manager in Brazil sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed four criteria; AAO found only judging criterion met, fewer than three required. Appeal dismissed; petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier field status.

Senior sourcing specialist sought national interest waiver as EB-2 advancing supply chain resilience and national security. Petitioner relied on field importance and federal priorities alignment. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and insufficient evidence of well-positioning to advance it.

An information security analyst holding a master's in cybersecurity operations sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a cybersecurity consulting firm. The AAO found the applicant demonstrated substantial merit but lacked evidence of the specific endeavor's national importance. General industry importance and alignment with federal priorities were insufficient.

Transit-oriented development executive self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Although satisfying four initial criteria for published material, judging, scholarly articles, and high remuneration, the AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability status.

A financial portfolio strategist in Canada claimed six EB-1A criteria but met only three per USCIS. On appeal, the AAO found the membership and published material criteria unmet and concluded the totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or top-tier status in finance.

A postdoctoral researcher in stress biology sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for neutrophil-targeted therapy research. The AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner did not demonstrate he is well-positioned to advance it, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

Financial executive claimed nine evidentiary criteria. AAO found three criteria met including judging, critical role, and scholarly articles on appeal. Final merits determination found evidence of some recognition insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim among very top of field.

A controls engineer sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar to advance Industry 4.0 manufacturing modernization. The AAO found him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor, lacking Ph.D. credentials, demonstrated influence in the field, and evidence of interest from relevant parties beyond his employer.

Skincare specialist seeking EB-2 NIW for personalized skincare business addressing dermatology, aesthetics, and mental health integration. AAO found petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility and did not satisfy first Dhanasar prong: proposed business lacks demonstrated national importance. Appeal dismissed.