Published AAO appeal decisions

Physical therapist sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Proposed clinical work treating patients with functional and cardiorespiratory disorders in healthcare facility. AAO disagreed with director on identifying proposed endeavor but affirmed no national importance shown; benefits confined to individual patients, lacking broader field implications. Matter remanded.

Self-petitioning carpet weaver sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. Service center found petitioner qualified as individual of exceptional ability. AAO reversed, finding petitioner does not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification; therefore dismissed appeal without reaching Dhanasar waiver analysis.

Senior electrical engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner qualified for EB-2 as advanced degree professional but failed NIW first prong: proposed endeavor in wireless communication and device development lacked demonstrated national importance beyond company-specific applications.

Chemical engineer sought EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. Proposed continuation of work on solid waste and water quality treatment. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to qualify for underlying EB-2 exceptional ability classification by meeting fewer than three regulatory criteria and failed first Dhanasar prong on national importance.

Medical epidemiologist sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW to advance public health preparedness and emergency response focusing on vaccine preventable diseases. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met first Dhanasar prong but failed second prong; evidence submitted post-filing was inadmissible, and petitioner did not rebut director's finding of insufficient positioning.

Chemist self-petitioner sought national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability in drug development. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to sufficiently describe her specific proposed future work, preventing analysis of substantial merit, national importance, or positioning.

Psychiatric nurse practitioner sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found he qualified for advanced degree classification but dismissed the NIW appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, affecting only individual patients rather than the field broadly.

A financial analyst sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, relying on academic records, an education evaluation and an employer letter to claim advanced degree status. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not establish the underlying advanced degree qualification, so the waiver analysis was not reached.

Flight simulator engineer sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. AAO remanded because Director failed to adequately analyze underlying EB-2 eligibility and did not apply Dhanasar framework to NIW claim despite beneficiary identifying specific proposed endeavor.

Economist with advanced degrees and federal and academic experience seeking NIW under EB-2. Petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification. AAO found proposed work in economics research has substantial merit but lacks national importance: petitioner provided only vague references to prior work without detailing specific prospective impact. Appeal dismissed.

Environmental engineer with Ph.D. sought EB-2 with NIW. Proposed continued research on water quality and waste treatment. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance research, and on balance waiver benefits the United States.

Audiologist and speech pathologist with 13 years experience claimed three Dhanasar prongs for NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding her specific proposed endeavor of providing clinical services lacks national importance because it lacks broader field implications and substantial economic effects beyond individual patients.

Entrepreneur sought NIW as EB-2 exceptional ability individual in business. AAO affirmed that petitioner failed to establish advanced degree or exceptional ability qualification under underlying EB-2 category. Dhanasar framework analysis not reached due to lack of prerequisite eligibility.

A software developer and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification as individual with exceptional ability or advanced degree, with national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability and lacked an advanced degree equivalent; therefore ineligible for underlying classification and national interest waiver analysis was unnecessary.

Physician seeking NIW under EB-2 for proposed work as medical scientist conducting disease research. AAO held first prong met but second prong failed because petitioner is not well positioned to conduct medical research given background only in medical practice. Substantial material change between initial and revised proposed endeavors also demonstrated lack of positioning.

Information systems manager sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to describe specific proposed endeavor with national importance, merely asserting occupation-level expertise; also failed to show waiver's balance favored United States.

Elementary school teacher seeks NIW for classroom instruction in special education and Portuguese language, plus hypothetical cultural center activities. AAO held classroom teaching and curriculum development lack national importance because one additional teacher does not mitigate workforce shortage or provide discernible impact.

Financial analyst seeking national interest waiver. Director found substantial merit but denied on national importance grounds. AAO affirmed; petitioner relied on prior accomplishments rather than demonstrating proposed work would impact industry broadly or create substantial U.S. economic effects.

Physical therapist assistant sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. Director approved exceptional ability; AAO withdrew that finding and found petitioner did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification due to insufficient evidence of degree equivalency and continuous professional licensure, rendering NIW analysis unnecessary.

A wholesale agricultural products company sought national interest waiver for a beneficiary. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the beneficiary failed to meet exceptional ability requirements and did not establish well-positioning to advance the proposed endeavor or that waiver would benefit the United States.

CEO and entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. Director denied both. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner did not qualify for underlying EB-2 as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability due to insufficient academic documentation, lack of progressive work experience, and deficient evidentiary support, rendering NIW analysis unnecessary.

An entrepreneur with fifteen years of business experience in strategy, development, and international trade sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner's proposed work expanding existing businesses lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong; no evidence of substantial economic impact beyond his companies.

Public health specialist seeks NIW for work in immunization, disease prevention, and maternal health. AAO held while public health field has merit, petitioner failed to identify specific projects or demonstrate prospective work extends beyond employers to impact public health field broadly at national level.

A micropigmentation professional sought EB-2 classification as individual of exceptional ability and NIW. The AAO dismissed, finding she met only one of three required criteria for exceptional ability: a license to practice. Training certificates did not qualify as official academic records; membership claim was not properly substantiated.

An accountant with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The petitioner claimed his tax planning and accounting work would have national importance. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because benefits would not extend beyond his employer and clients or impact the accounting industry broadly.