Published AAO appeal decisions

Senior reliability engineer with Ph.D. in mechanical engineering sought NIW for continued work in consumer electronics hardware reliability testing. AAO found work lacked national importance; specific endeavor did not have broader implications beyond assigned hardware modules despite field importance.

Software engineer with master's degree proposing to develop open-source web components library for data visualization. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong; general STEM field importance insufficient without demonstrated broad impact.

Structural engineer consultant seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner holds advanced degree and meets substantial merit requirement. However, proposed endeavor lacks national importance because partnerships undefined, events unspecified, and projected creation of twenty jobs insufficient. Proposed business does not demonstrate broader field impact or substantial economic effects. First Dhanasar prong not satisfied; appeal dismissed.

General manager seeking EB-2 NIW for business consulting services claimed company importance to U.S. business ecosystem. AAO dismissed, finding no sufficient evidence that proposed endeavor would impact business consulting field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects at national level.

Quantitative finance analyst self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of financial risk modeling work. AAO affirmed denial, finding no demonstrated national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry importance; opinion letters lacked sufficient specificity.

An IT program manager seeking EB-2 classification and NIW claimed exceptional ability and national importance for proposed IT project management business. AAO found he failed to meet three evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability and that his proposed endeavor lacked national importance beyond his company and clients, thus denying the NIW.

A postdoctoral researcher in metabolic diseases sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. She satisfied the first prong (substantial merit and national importance) but failed the second: she lacked a clear plan, institutional commitment, or funding evidence to demonstrate she was well-positioned to advance her work, so the appeal was dismissed.

Computer network architect self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding her proposed endeavor in telecommunications security had substantial merit but lacked the national importance required by Dhanasar's first prong, as general field alignment does not establish specific endeavor impact.

HR professional and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW based on proposed AI platform connecting businesses with artisans and sustainable fashion work. AAO found endeavor lacked sufficient national importance; broad statements about economic benefits and job creation were unsubstantiated by corroborating evidence of prospective impact.

A researcher in sustainable building and construction proposes to advance climate-resilient environmental research through peer publication and conferences. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because the record shows only ordinary research activities similar to all other researchers, without evidence of broader field impact or adoption by decision-makers.

A software development manager with master's degree sought a national interest waiver. The AAO held his proposed work as a software development manager lacked national importance; despite alignment with cybersecurity policy goals, no evidence demonstrated prospective impact beyond employer clients or field-wide significance. Appeal dismissed.

A chemical biologist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed eligibility under six criteria including awards, original contributions, and leading role. AAO found awards insufficient, original contributions not of major significance, leading role not established, and overall record lacking sustained acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Research scientist in natural language processing holds Ph.D. and works as research associate. Claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Met three regulatory criteria including judging and scholarly articles. AAO upheld denial because totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained acclaim or position among small percentage at top of field.

A Brazilian barbecue equipment manufacturer and CEO claimed seven EB-1A criteria. The AAO found he did not meet at least five of the claimed criteria, including membership and original contributions, and therefore failed to establish the required three criteria threshold.

Visual artist and art entrepreneur sought EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed five criteria but met only exhibitions. Published material articles lacked required author information and insufficient circulation data. Failed to meet three-criterion threshold. Appeal dismissed.

Business consultant and CEO from Russia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner met two criteria: lesser awards and judging. The AAO rejected original contributions as merely disseminating others' work and found articles non-scholarly. Because the petitioner met only two of ten required evidentiary criteria, the AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching final merits.

Special education coordinator sought EB-2 NIW to establish Texas education consultancy. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor, which lacked identifiable unique methodologies or prospective broad impact beyond local service provision.

A professional in international educational development with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2. AAO dismissed because while the field is important, the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of her specific endeavor—placing visiting teachers in U.S. classrooms—which lacks broad implications beyond limited participants.

A management and operations specialist with engineering background sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to meet three of the ten required evidentiary criteria, and withdrew SCOPS findings on judging and high salary as unsupported.

A former judge seeks extraordinary ability classification based on judicial work in Armenia. The AAO found the petitioner met only the original contributions criterion and one criterion already accepted by the service center, falling short of the required three criteria. Appeal dismissed because threshold initial evidence requirements were not satisfied.

Software developer sought NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. Petitioner met only two of six required evidentiary criteria: official academic record and compensation. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability significantly above ordinarily encountered in field, failing antecedent requirement for NIW consideration.

Ph.D. student in computer science with research focus on human-machine interfaces and AI sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO reversed service center on prong one, finding national importance established, but affirmed dismissal after finding petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor.

A construction manager with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the record demonstrated the specific endeavor had substantial merit but lacked evidence of national importance. Letters and documents addressed the petitioner's skills, not the endeavor's national implications or economic benefits.

A clinical psychologist sought EB-2 national interest waiver to operate a mental health treatment center using proprietary methodology. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because individual patient services and training courses would not broadly impact the mental health field.

An IT professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver to establish an LLC providing custom IT services to small and medium businesses. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite cybersecurity's overall importance, as benefits would not extend beyond the LLC's immediate clients.