Entrepreneur in business and corporate law sought EB-2 NIW. Appeal dismissed on signature deficiency and failure to establish national importance; petitioner focused broadly on energy investment industry rather than specific endeavor, without proving impact beyond secondary effects in narrow area.

An avionics specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification together with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because he did not show ten years of full-time experience with reliable evidence, so he lacked the underlying classification and the waiver analysis was not reached.

A systems engineer sought an NIW but failed to demonstrate national importance for his endeavor. The AAO found his business plans and impact claims too general and localized; assertions about secondary ripple effects and industry alignment did not satisfy Dhanasar's requirement for substantial positive economic effects or broad field advancement.

Food waste management entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification with advanced degree. Petitioner claimed innovative sustainable solutions would have national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor insufficiently defined and fails first prong because scope unclear, innovative tools undefined, and competitive advantages undemonstrated compared to existing market offerings.