Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
O-1ASports and athleticsEmployerDecided April 2021Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR052021_03D8101

MembershipNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzed

Our summary

A university petitioned to extend O-1A classification for an assistant coach. The appeal was dismissed because the beneficiary failed to demonstrate three required evidentiary criteria; membership claim lacked evidence that the association selected members based on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • Membership · Membership evidence does not establish requirement that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
MembershipNot metMembership evidence does not establish requirement that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not fully analyzed; decision reserved issue
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed; decision reserved issue after finding membership failed

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.