Outcome: Dismissed
APR052021_03D8101
Our summary
A university petitioned to extend O-1A classification for an assistant coach. The appeal was dismissed because the beneficiary failed to demonstrate three required evidentiary criteria; membership claim lacked evidence that the association selected members based on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Membership · Membership evidence does not establish requirement that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Membership evidence does not establish requirement that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized experts | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not fully analyzed; decision reserved issue | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; decision reserved issue after finding membership failed |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
