Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided April 2025Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR092025_04B2203

ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetPublished materialMetAwardsClaimed, not analyzedCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedLeading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A tattoo artist sought extraordinary ability classification under EB-1A. Though the petitioner met three initial criteria including judging and exhibitions, the AAO found the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or membership in the very top of the field despite support letters and competition awards.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Petitioner awarded first-place trophy at competition; event participation documented
  • Judging · Petitioner received invitations to judge tattoo competitions; multiple judging engagements documented
  • Published material · Director determined petitioner satisfied at least three criteria; publications discussed

What was missing

  • Final merits · Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among top of field

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetPetitioner awarded first-place trophy at competition; event participation documented
JudgingMetPetitioner received invitations to judge tattoo competitions; multiple judging engagements documented
Published materialMetDirector determined petitioner satisfied at least three criteria; publications discussed
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedPetitioner does not claim major internationally recognized award; criterion noted but not analyzed
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Leading or critical roleClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed by decision
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed
Final meritsNot metPetitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place among top of field

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.