Outcome: Dismissed
APR232020_16B2203
Our summary
A dancer and choreographer who co-founded a dance company self-petitioned for extraordinary ability. She met judging and exhibitions criteria but failed on published material and leading role criteria. The AAO dismissed, finding her regional career insufficient for sustained national acclaim at top field level.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Petitioner's performances constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
- Judging · Petitioner served as judge at regional dance competitions.
What was missing
- Leading or critical role · No detailed evidence establishing leading or critical role or distinguished organizational reputations.
- Published material · Articles submitted do not devote significant attention to petitioner or appear in major media.
- Final merits · Viable regional career insufficient; no sustained national or international acclaim shown.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner's performances constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases. | |
| Met | Petitioner served as judge at regional dance competitions. | |
| Not met | No detailed evidence establishing leading or critical role or distinguished organizational reputations. | |
| Not met | Articles submitted do not devote significant attention to petitioner or appear in major media. | |
| Not met | Viable regional career insufficient; no sustained national or international acclaim shown. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
