Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AArts, design, architectureIndividualDecided April 2020Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

APR232020_16B2203

ExhibitionsMetJudgingMetLeading or critical roleNot metPublished materialNot metFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A dancer and choreographer who co-founded a dance company self-petitioned for extraordinary ability. She met judging and exhibitions criteria but failed on published material and leading role criteria. The AAO dismissed, finding her regional career insufficient for sustained national acclaim at top field level.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Exhibitions · Petitioner's performances constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
  • Judging · Petitioner served as judge at regional dance competitions.

What was missing

  • Leading or critical role · No detailed evidence establishing leading or critical role or distinguished organizational reputations.
  • Published material · Articles submitted do not devote significant attention to petitioner or appear in major media.
  • Final merits · Viable regional career insufficient; no sustained national or international acclaim shown.

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
ExhibitionsMetPetitioner's performances constitute display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
JudgingMetPetitioner served as judge at regional dance competitions.
Leading or critical roleNot metNo detailed evidence establishing leading or critical role or distinguished organizational reputations.
Published materialNot metArticles submitted do not devote significant attention to petitioner or appear in major media.
Final meritsNot metViable regional career insufficient; no sustained national or international acclaim shown.

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.