Outcome: Dismissed
APR262018_02B2203
Our summary
Television producer with over 30 years experience seeks extraordinary ability classification in education. Claims five criteria met. AAO found only judging criterion satisfied; record does not support three required criteria. Appeal dismissed; final merits not addressed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Participated as juror for competition in 2010 and 2011
What was missing
- Commercial success · Government contract does not establish commercial success; infrastructure investments lack specific details
- Leading or critical role · Participation as advisor and editor; record does not show direct impact on organizational success
- Membership · Juror status for competition does not constitute membership requiring outstanding achievements
- Published material · Two articles from major Mexican newspaper insufficient; does not meet plain language requirements
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Participated as juror for competition in 2010 and 2011 | |
| Not met | Government contract does not establish commercial success; infrastructure investments lack specific details | |
| Not met | Participation as advisor and editor; record does not show direct impact on organizational success | |
| Not met | Juror status for competition does not constitute membership requiring outstanding achievements | |
| Not met | Two articles from major Mexican newspaper insufficient; does not meet plain language requirements | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Only one criterion met; does not reach final merits step |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
