Outcome: Dismissed
APR272021_01B2203
Our summary
A musician and composer claimed extraordinary ability through seven criteria. The AAO found only two criteria met: judging and exhibitions. The decision concluded the petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and therefore did not reach final merits analysis, dismissing the appeal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Displayed work by performing at various artistic and musical venues
- Judging · Served as voting member for Grammy Awards and juror for orchestra and SoundRec.com
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award received or established
- Leading or critical role · Work does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field
- Published material · Articles either not about petitioner or from publications not established as major media
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Displayed work by performing at various artistic and musical venues | |
| Met | Served as voting member for Grammy Awards and juror for orchestra and SoundRec.com | |
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award received or established | |
| Not met | Work does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at top of field | |
| Not met | Articles either not about petitioner or from publications not established as major media | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed initially but not pursued on appeal and not further analyzed | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Did not meet threshold of three criteria; final merits not reached per Kazarian |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
