Outcome: Dismissed
AUG032016_01B2203
Our summary
Motion graphics artist sought EB-1A classification in the arts. Director found only one criterion met (artistic display). Petitioner appealed claiming two additional criteria but provided insufficient evidence of awards, published material, or original contributions of major significance. AAO affirmed dismissal.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Exhibitions · Director found petitioner met artistic display criterion under regulation
What was missing
- Awards · Petitioner abandoned claim in RFE response; no evidence of nationally recognized award
- High salary · Evidence does not establish high salary relative to others in field
- Original contributions · Reference letters praised talents but did not show contributions of major significance
- Published material · Submission of artistic work alone without published articles about her insufficient
- Final merits · Record does not support expertise level required for classification
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met artistic display criterion under regulation | |
| Not met | Petitioner abandoned claim in RFE response; no evidence of nationally recognized award | |
| Not met | Evidence does not establish high salary relative to others in field | |
| Not met | Reference letters praised talents but did not show contributions of major significance | |
| Not met | Submission of artistic work alone without published articles about her insufficient | |
| Not met | Record does not support expertise level required for classification |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
