Outcome: Dismissed
AUG062024_02B2203
Our summary
A dogsledding competitor claimed three EB-1A criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that she lacks a major, internationally recognized award and failed to satisfy three criteria despite meeting two (awards and leading role). The totality lacked evidence of sustained acclaim at the very top of the field.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met criterion for leading or critical role; AAO did not disturb
What was missing
- Awards · No major, internationally recognized award demonstrated; media coverage insufficient
- Membership · Did not meet all requirements for membership in organizations requiring outstanding achievements
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met criterion for leading or critical role; AAO did not disturb | |
| Not met | No major, internationally recognized award demonstrated; media coverage insufficient | |
| Not met | Did not meet all requirements for membership in organizations requiring outstanding achievements | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
