Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided August 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

AUG062024_02B2203

Leading or critical roleMetAwardsNot metMembershipNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedJudgingClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedPublished materialClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

A dogsledding competitor claimed three EB-1A criteria. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that she lacks a major, internationally recognized award and failed to satisfy three criteria despite meeting two (awards and leading role). The totality lacked evidence of sustained acclaim at the very top of the field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met criterion for leading or critical role; AAO did not disturb

What was missing

  • Awards · No major, internationally recognized award demonstrated; media coverage insufficient
  • Membership · Did not meet all requirements for membership in organizations requiring outstanding achievements
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleMetDirector found petitioner met criterion for leading or critical role; AAO did not disturb
AwardsNot metNo major, internationally recognized award demonstrated; media coverage insufficient
MembershipNot metDid not meet all requirements for membership in organizations requiring outstanding achievements
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
JudgingClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
Published materialClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top percentage status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.