Outcome: Dismissed
SEP132024_01B2203
Our summary
An automotive journalist claimed five EB-1A criteria beyond the leading role criterion the director found met. The AAO affirmed rejections of awards, published material, and judging criteria. With only one criterion met, petitioner failed the threshold and lacked sustained international acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed this finding
What was missing
- Awards · Waived on appeal; petitioner did not contest director's rejection of lesser awards
- Judging · Petitioner is a journalist; did not judge work of other journalists or allied field
- Published material · Material in Falha de Sao Paulo does not qualify; major media in Brazil but not about petitioner's work
- Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or very top field status
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Director found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed this finding | |
| Not met | Waived on appeal; petitioner did not contest director's rejection of lesser awards | |
| Not met | Petitioner is a journalist; did not judge work of other journalists or allied field | |
| Not met | Material in Falha de Sao Paulo does not qualify; major media in Brazil but not about petitioner's work | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Not among the criteria claimed by petitioner on appeal | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed in decision | |
| Not met | Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or very top field status |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
