Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1AMarketing, media, communicationsIndividualDecided September 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

SEP132024_01B2203

Leading or critical roleMetAwardsNot metJudgingNot metPublished materialNot metCommercial successClaimed, not analyzedExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedHigh salaryClaimed, not analyzedMembershipClaimed, not analyzedOriginal contributionsClaimed, not analyzedScholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

An automotive journalist claimed five EB-1A criteria beyond the leading role criterion the director found met. The AAO affirmed rejections of awards, published material, and judging criteria. With only one criterion met, petitioner failed the threshold and lacked sustained international acclaim.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

What the AAO accepted

  • Leading or critical role · Director found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed this finding

What was missing

  • Awards · Waived on appeal; petitioner did not contest director's rejection of lesser awards
  • Judging · Petitioner is a journalist; did not judge work of other journalists or allied field
  • Published material · Material in Falha de Sao Paulo does not qualify; major media in Brazil but not about petitioner's work
  • Final merits · Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or very top field status

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
Leading or critical roleMetDirector found petitioner met criterion; AAO affirmed this finding
AwardsNot metWaived on appeal; petitioner did not contest director's rejection of lesser awards
JudgingNot metPetitioner is a journalist; did not judge work of other journalists or allied field
Published materialNot metMaterial in Falha de Sao Paulo does not qualify; major media in Brazil but not about petitioner's work
Commercial successClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
ExhibitionsClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
High salaryClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed or analyzed in the decision
MembershipClaimed, not analyzedNot among the criteria claimed by petitioner on appeal
Original contributionsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Scholarly articlesClaimed, not analyzedClaimed but not analyzed in decision
Final meritsNot metRecord does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or very top field status

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.