Outcome: Dismissed
AUG092018_01B2203
Our summary
Athlete and coach claimed extraordinary ability in athletics and major award status. Despite evaluating evidence as both athlete and coach, AAO found only one criterion met (Olympic team membership), below three-criterion threshold. No sustained national or international acclaim demonstrated. Appeal dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Membership · Membership on 2000 and 2004 Olympic teams established
What was missing
- Awards · Medals documented but not shown to be major internationally recognized awards
- Published material · Cereal box lacked date and author; hall of fame screenshot lacked required documentation
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Membership on 2000 and 2004 Olympic teams established | |
| Not met | Medals documented but not shown to be major internationally recognized awards | |
| Not met | Cereal box lacked date and author; hall of fame screenshot lacked required documentation | |
| Not reached / not discussed | Only one criterion met; threshold of three not reached; final merits not required |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
