Outcome: Dismissed
AUG192005_11B2203
Our summary
A finance researcher claimed extraordinary ability based on academic awards, teaching honors, research grants, and professional memberships. The AAO found academic honors ineligible as student-only awards, internal teaching award not nationally recognized, grants not excellence prizes, and membership lacking evidence of outstanding-achievement requirements. Petition dismissed.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Academic honors ineligible; internal teaching award not nationally recognized; research grants not prizes for excellence
- Membership · No evidence that association membership requires outstanding achievement as essential condition
- Final merits · Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Academic honors ineligible; internal teaching award not nationally recognized; research grants not prizes for excellence | |
| Not met | No evidence that association membership requires outstanding achievement as essential condition | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed | |
| Not met | Record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
