Outcome: Dismissed
MAY272021_02B2203
Our summary
Investment firm petitioned for investment banking executive beneficiary claiming six criteria. AAO found at most one criterion met and rejected the director's published material finding, concluding petitioner failed to establish extraordinary ability or the three-criterion threshold.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · Beneficiary was not personally named as award recipient; companies he worked for received awards
- Membership · Membership in NAUFOR required payment and license only, not outstanding achievement judged by experts
- Published material · Director found published material met criterion, but AAO disagreed; articles were not about beneficiary
- Final merits · Petitioner failed to meet three-criterion threshold; only one criterion found met by director
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | Beneficiary was not personally named as award recipient; companies he worked for received awards | |
| Not met | Membership in NAUFOR required payment and license only, not outstanding achievement judged by experts | |
| Not met | Director found published material met criterion, but AAO disagreed; articles were not about beneficiary | |
| Not met | Petitioner failed to meet three-criterion threshold; only one criterion found met by director |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
